Weekly Questions and Answers
Questions for this column are submitted by powder coaters just like you who are seeking ways to improve efficiencies and solve every day problems on their powder coating lines.
Click on questions below to view answers.
Q: We’re having trouble with a particular powder that we use. When we had the powder analyzed, the moisture content was at 0.06 percent. It tested at 1.2 percent when it came in the door. After fluidizing it for a few days, it dropped significantly. This seems very low to me. What would the normal range be for a polyester-hybrid-type powder? K.H., Muskegon, Mich.
The moisture in a powder coating is affected by climatic and storage conditions. Powders are normally shipped in sealed bags within boxes or drums to keep moisture from being absorbed into the material. Rapid changes in climatic conditions (from hot to cold, from dry to humid) can have a dramatic effect on the moisture content in the powder. This is why it’s always recommended to move the powder from a storage room to the point of use 24 hours ahead of time to ensure that the powder has acclimatized to the application environment. Opening a sealed bag of powder before it has acclimatized will ensure rapid moisture development in the material.
Moist powder has a tendency to clump, making fluidization and pumping difficult. This clumping can cause clogged pumps, blocked hoses, and “seeds” on the part, as well as an increase in the incidence of impact fusion. The typical way to reduce moisture in powder is to fluidize it with clean and dry (less than or equal to 38°F dew point) compressed air for a period of time greater than or equal to 3 hours, depending upon the amount of moisture in the powder coating. This is why the moisture content reduced after fluidizing it for a while (a good thing).
Now to your questions: “How low can the moisture be in powder coating?” It can never be too low. The dryer the powder is the easier it is to fluidize, pump, atomize, and control film thickness and surface appearance. Moisture will also affect the electrostatic charging efficiency. Too much moisture will lower the electrostatic charge on the particles and reduce transfer efficiency and film build, therefore, you cannot be too dry. The only issue with “over-charge” powder particles is that Faraday cage problems may increase, and thicker coatings will exhibit back ionization. Both of these problems are easily corrected by using the gun charging controls provided on the gun control panel. —N.L.
Q: I run the powder coating department at a company. My problem is that I can’t keep the powder from coming out of the booth. I can change the filters in the collector, but in 2 weeks the powder is coming out of the booth like it was before I changed the filters. Any help you can give me would be very appreciated. A.H., Pine Bluff, Ark.
Powder escaping from a spray booth can be attributed to several things. Occasionally, it can be attributed to a combination of several of these things. These things can include spray guns directed toward the booth openings, cross drafts from some air currents in the plant, and booth modifications from the original design. This happens more often than it should. Some accountant or management person won’t spend the money for new equipment designed for the work, so the openings are modified, which means the fan is no longer in tune with the openings.
You should have access to the designed airflow readings at the openings, especially the part openings. When you install new filters, verify these airflows. While you’re in the process of changing the filters, check the plate that divides the two sides of the chamber (clean side/dirty side). Verify that this plate isn’t warped. In addition, check the final filters for powder. Check the amperage and current readings of the fan, and be sure the fan is operating at its design rating.
Then there is always the possibility that you’re using cheap or reconditioned filters, and they’re plugging prematurely. How about the blowdown tubes? Is the blowdown air set correctly (at least 60 pounds per square inch)? Are the tubes aimed toward the inside of the filter so that blowdown air has a chance to remove powder from the filters?
The next time the filters are changed, check the old filters and observe the packed powder in the crevice of the pleats. Is it packed like the powder might be damp? Is the blowdown air dry? Is there condensate in the pipe feed line that could be causing the air to become moist? Your problem is being caused by one or several of these conditions. —G.T.
Q: My partner and I have different views when spraying several pieces with the same powder on a large rack in a spray booth. I think you need to start application at the far end of the filters and work in, and he thinks you need to start at the filter end and work out. By starting near the filters and working back, all of your parts end up with overspray and more powder than anticipated. Any comments? J.I., Norwood, Pa.
If you begin to spray a part as it enters the spray booth, you should get a good coating. So-called overspray should meld in with the coating when it’s cured. If there is a lot of overspray then (a) there is something wrong with the filters or (b) application needs some attention. If you begin to spray at the midpoint of the filters, you run the risk of powder drifting out of the booth along with the parts. Obviously, this isn’t good.
Overspray on the uncured parts shouldn’t be an issue other than to contribute to film build. If the film tends to be heavy, it’s time to look at gun output. What jumps out at me here is the amount of overspray at the filters. Sounds a lot like the filters need cleaning or replacing. Or is the blower sized correctly for the booth? —G.T.
Q: We’re a custom parts coater, and we have to apply powder paint with different types of finishes (smooth, textured, wrinkle, sand texture, etc). My question (problem!) is: When we bake textured powder in a 100-foot-long convection oven (parts moved on a conveyor), we get small black or gray holes, depending of the color we paint. The holes don’t reach the raw material. The bigger concern we have is when we paint the same color and finish on another conveyor, we don’t have the same problem (except one time). One of the conveyors has infrared in the first 12 feet, and the other (the problematic one) doesn’t. One is a U conveyor, and the other (the problematic one) is in-line. In the two cases, we apply around 5 mils with the same electrostatic gun parameters. The ovens are set at 400°F with IR at 50 percent. We stop the conveyor during the employees’ break. This week, we had the same problem with the IR conveyor when parts stopped in the oven during the employees’ break. Parts in front of the oven were OK. How can we avoid this type of problem? C.F., Drummondville, Que.
The problem you’re experiencing is cross-contamination of different color powders in the oven. This is caused when the airflow within a convection cure oven displaces the powder on the part surface before it has melted onto the surface. This displaced powder will be carried onto parts of a different color or can accumulate within the oven and ductwork. The powder will melt, cure, and eventually degrade to ash (black or brown). This material will be picked up by the oven circulation airstream, deposited onto parts as they enter the oven, and mixed into the coating, leaving specks.
You won’t have as big a problem with cross-contamination when you’re using the same color on both lines. (It’s there, but you just don’t see it.) Also, the line that has the IR preheat will melt the powder onto the surface before the oven airstream can carry it away or deposit it onto other parts.
The solution to this problem is multifaceted. First, you should have all your oven surfaces cleaned regularly (at least monthly) by using a vacuum and damp mop. Second, you should close off, or reduce, the duct openings to slow the air velocity at the entrance to your oven. Third, if you have a forced-air air curtain at the entrance to maintain heat control, adjust or redirect this unit so that it doesn’t blow directly onto the coated parts. Finally, any changes to your oven necessitate a new oven profile to verify cure cycle times for your parts. —N.L.
Q: We’re a custom powder coating shop that uses many colors of TGIC (triglycidyl isocyanurate) polyester. We purchase powder in 55-pound boxes and always have some left over. Some of that powder is now reaching 18 months in our shop inventory. Our powder is always dated when received and kept at 68°F with controlled humidity. So far, all the older powder sprays and applies great. What adverse effects in powder application and coating performance should we look for with powder that exceeds recommended storage time? H.S., Charleston, W.Va.
Old powder can exhibit poor fluidization characteristics and may suffer some loss of electrostatics. You may see a difference in appearance, such as tighter orange peel or an uneven finish. Occasionally, you can lose some of the coating properties. Eighteen months is way beyond what most powder suppliers’ recommend. A powder specialist will tell you that if the powder is properly stored, it will usually last longer than the recommended storage time. The problem in all of this is the initial chemistry of the powder. Low cures won’t have this kind of shelf life, and if you have some that have worked, you’re on borrowed time. Standard powders will last longer than specialty powders, but don’t push it. —G.T.
Q: I have a question about the thermal conductivity of powder coatings. We’re designing a dual headlamp bicycle light with an aluminum heat sink. It’s an aluminum alloy with 10 percent silicone and 3 percent zinc. We were originally interested in anodizing the heat sink for coloration. Due to the high silicone count, the anodizing will be problematic because it will give us discoloration. So, we’re currently interested in having our heat sinks powder coated, but we’re worried about the thermal conductivity and the heat dissipation for our powerful bike light. Will the powder coating trap the heat to the extent of affecting our light’s output and the life of the unit? Please feel free to E-mail or call us for further information, we’re very interested in your feedback. G.F., Evanston, Ill.
Any organic coating (paint) either liquid or powder will reduce heat dissipation compared with inorganic coatings, like anodizing. Organic coatings are resin-based materials; inorganic coatings are metal or metal oxide based materials. Resins won’t conduct heat as metal would. It would be like comparing the thermal properties of plastic with those of metal. Add the fact that most organic coatings are considerably thicker than inorganic coatings (powder cannot be reliably applied under 1.5 mils), and this makes a bad situation even worse. Some organic coatings conduct heat better than others by using metal pigments and additives. However, even these won’t compare favorably with inorganic coatings for heat dissipation.
I have no idea how much heat dissipation you require to meet your design criteria. I recommend that you discuss your requirements with several coating suppliers (both organic and inorganic), coat some samples, and put them on a lifecycle test. This is the only way you’ll be able to prove the design before committing to a technology that may or may not work in production. Good luck. —N.L.
Q: My company has manufactured welded components for years by using a variety of steel. Our operation includes an in-line blaster and a six-stage iron phosphate system. We use a polyester powder topcoat. We have always had two employees manually reinforce Faraday cage areas before the parts are coated with our 10 automatic guns. I was given a project to reduce the manual reinforcement to one person. We have a very diverse product line with multiple concerns, that is, we have deep corners and pockets on each component. Although I’m early into the project, it appears to be quite a challenge to reduce reinforcement while maintaining our quality level and consistency of mil thickness. I’m certain racking orientation can be changed to standardize a lot of Faraday areas so that they face the operator. Any helpful hints on gun positioning, maximizing coverage, or success stories of other companies that you can provide, will be appreciated. S.H., Johnson City, Tenn.
Your charge (excuse the pun, but not intended) is to eliminate bodies, or at least a body, and the alternative probably is the addition of a spray gun or two. At least the gun doesn’t need health care or vacation or time off for illness. As you noted, you may have to really rack your brain to see how many parts on the manual reinforcement list can be hung so that one person can do the job. The next thing to consider would be to mount a “stray” gun or two on an independent gun bar, maybe affixed directly to the cabin wall, that would be directed to a weak spot.
I’ve seen some weird looking gun arrangements in booths, and they are invariably for that purpose. Tell the boss that this won’t be easy or quick, but it may be possible. Set up a spare gun and controller from spare parts inventory for trial. If that works, use the cost savings to pay for a new gun, or two, or whatever is required. The trick may be, if you don’t have gun triggering or part ID, is to figure out how to do this without creating too much film thickness in other areas. —G.T.
Q: We have some flat 3/16-inch galvanized steel door frames, 10 inches wide, that we have primed and subsequently coated in black. There are surface imperfections (grinder swirls) visible through the black powder that are the result of too much prep work with a grinder and a scouring pad. To get the surface flat again, we’re considering sanding it with a long board sander and then recoating it with the black. What method or grit paper would you recommend to remove material effectively, but still have the scratches fill with the recoat. Thank You. C.C., Yuba City, Calif.
By now I’m sure you’ve already figured out how to correct this defect, as I’m way behind with my answers. However, I’ll offer my “two-cents” on your problem. Based upon your description, it’s likely that your topcoat is a smooth gloss black, which often highlights surface scratches, even more so than any other color or gloss. If it were flat or textured black, you wouldn’t have the same problem. For this reason, you should start with no more than 100-grit paper to bring down the surface. End with 500-grit, or higher. You may even have to use wet-sanding techniques to unload the sanding paper and reduce the scuff marks. —N.L.
Q: I have a chrome BMX bike, and I want to have it painted. What do I need to do for that to be done? D.C., Mechanicville, N.Y.
The chrome plating will have to be scuffed for adhesion. However, some chemicals on the market claim to create a surface that will allow paint to adhere to chrome with no peeling. You can check the magazine’s annual Buyer’s Guide to find a vendor. I have no background on this material and personally would have to be shown that it works—and not for 15 minutes. I’m talking about durability in the weather and wind, and flying bugs and stones. Or, there is the old elbow grease. Scuff ALL of the chrome, wipe it ALL with solvent and then a tack rag, and then paint. You might have to use a ground strap to get good ground, depending on how you handle the parts. —G.T.
Q: Is there a high-density foam I can use to mask my parts? J.V., Ensenada, Baja, Calif.
The short answer is no. High-density foams do not have the temperature tolerance to withstand the oven temperatures necessary to cure powder coatings. The preferred masking material for custom masking products is silicone-based, as they are stable up to 600°F. —N.L.
Q: We are applying a textured white powder, and we are facing some issues meeting the gloss level required. Our spec is 3.0-5.5 at 60 degrees. The cure schedule for the powder is 12 min at 350°F. We succeeded in achieving the gloss between 4.0 and 5.0 when we applied the powder manually in a spray-to-waste booth. However, when we start applying the powder in the automatic cyclone booth with reclaim system, the gloss value drops to 2.5 to 2.9. The values of film thickness are about the same at 4.0 to 6.0 mils. We don’t know if there is anything in the reclaim that might be affecting the powder and killing the gloss. I would appreciate any advice to get the right results in the automatic system. F.G., Guadalupe, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
The fine particles of the reclaim are the culprit, although your powder supplier should take into consideration some percentage of reclaim when formulating the material. The reclaim estimate should be no greater than 40 percent. The supplier may have used a higher number. Anyway, if your process is less than 60 percent efficient, you have too much reclaim, which could be causing your loss of gloss.
Standard design criteria for powder application is 60 percent, unless the buyer knows that the part is an easy target or a difficult one. If reclaim is the problem, and it sounds as if it is, then the only control you have is in the amount of reclaim in the system. After that, it’s up to your powder supplier to make adjustments. —G.T.
Q: Is it necessary to wait until the oven is up to temperature before putting parts into it? This oven is 8 feet by 8 feet by 20 feet. By putting the parts in at startup, do I risk the chance of orange peel by heating the substrate too slow? What benefits am I getting by waiting for the oven to get up to temp? R.G., St. Albans, W.Va.
You can place the parts in the oven anytime you want. However, the critical activity is the time at temperature of the part, according to the powder supplier’s cure chart. You can have the parts in the oven all day at 180°F and it won’t be cured. If the powder is scheduled to be cured at 380°F for 10 minutes, then that’s what it means. The problem with placing parts in the oven before it has reached cure temperature is that when you open the doors, you will lose some heat, so now you have regressed in your climb to cure temperature. And, unless you stand by the temperature recorder and watch it, how will you know when the oven is hot
Q: We have a 20-foot gas oven controlled by a universal digital temperature controller. We’re having problems with it functioning properly. We’re also having difficulties finding support or repair services as the equipment is very old. We cleaned everything and changed a gasket. Possible problem areas could be the thermal coupling, flame rod, or scanner. What’s happening is that the oven will begin to head toward the 390°F limit, but without even getting close to that heat, it will shut off the burner and begin to purge. It’s inconsistently going up and then back down in temperature repeatedly. We tried resetting the burner, which helped a little, but it began doing the same thing. Any help or ideas to direct us to getting someone who services this old equipment, or any ideas what the problem could be, would be greatly appreciated. It’s hard to fix when we’re unsure what’s wrong. Production shut down completely. Yikes! T.M., Honolulu, Hawaii
I’m sure the company that made your temperature controller has documentation on the unit you have. You may even get it online at the company’s web site. I don’t recommend trying to fix this oven problem yourself. There are plenty of gas-train and burner service companies that can help you. Making a mistake here can cause, at minimum, a fouled oven by having too much soot in your system to, in the worst-case scenario, an explosion. Manufacturers and suppliers of ovens often subcontract the work of maintenance and service to local gas-burner service companies. Calling them yourself is your best choice, as the alternative can be devastating. —N.L.
Q: We are doing repairs on returned powder-coated parts. They are made of cold rolled steel or Galvannealed steel that are powder-coated with various colors of polyester TGIC powder. We sand the repair area, fix the part (whether it is fixing a dent or welding it), finish sanding, and then etch before powder coating the area again. The problem is how do we etch without damaging the coating around the fixed area? What would you recommend to solve our problem? What process should we try? Is there a process available to do this in a field-setting? Thank you. G.B., Biddeford, Maine
At your local automotive refinish shop, you can buy several different types of acidic etching materials that can be used to etch the repaired area of your part. Automotive shops use this material all of the time. In the areas that don’t need repair, you just flush away the material. It shouldn’t have any negative effects on the good finish if that finish is properly cured and has no voids in the surface. And yes, this can be done in the field. You don’t need to etch the repaired area if you haven’t sanded to bare metal.
Several questions pop to mind though. Are you repairing the defect with powder over powder? Are you trying to spot-repair, or do you recoat the entire part? Spot repair with powder will leave a halo defect in the finish that sometimes looks as bad or worse than the original defect. Liquid touch-up is totally acceptable in our industry. —G.T.
Q: I work in the automobile industry, and my company is having problems processing vehicles for powder coating. What happens is that about 10 vehicles can be coated with the same powder without incident. After that, pinholes and craters appear in localized areas, such as in the load body. Why does this happen? M.M., Monterrey, Mexico
The problem you describe happens when contaminants are introduced into a coating process. For instance, oil in your compressed air and/or airborne silicone contamination will wreak havoc by creating craters, blisters, and fisheyes on all the parts run when the contaminant is present and then go completely away on its own when the contaminant is not present. This on-again/off-again situation will drive you crazy until you identify the source of the contaminant(s) and eliminate it.
Most coating operations outlaw silicone, manage their compressed air supply, control which substances are introduced in and around the coating area, including hand creams, lotions, perfumes, etc., to totally eliminate this contamination issue. —N.L.
Q: Is it possible to recoat a powder-coat finish with another powder-coat finish, as in changing colors of a part? What type of preparation is necessary to ensure good adhesion? B.W., Carrollton, Tex.
Yes, it’s possible and done frequently. To be on the safe side, try a sample piece to check. If you’re applying powder from the same supplier, and it’s of the same chemistry, you shouldn’t have any problems. But if the chemistry is different (polyester over an epoxy or hybrid over an acrylic, as examples), there can be surface tension issues as well as incompatibility between other chemicals in the formula.
To be safe, spray a sample. For surface preparation, scuff-sand the surface area of the part to be coated, especially if the coating is a high-gloss material. Film thickness will be a bit less because of the insulating factor, and orange peel will be more pronounced, but with proper preparation, adhesion should be good. Don’t forget to clean off the sanding dust! —G.T.
Q: Is there any way to achieve a carbon-fiber look with powder coating? C.A., Topeka, Kans.
There is one method that comes to mind to achieve a carbon-fiber look in a powder-coated product: dye sublimation. This requires specially formulated powder coatings with initiators to accept the imaging process and specialized equipment to apply the image transfer. Occasionally, a clear coat is used to protect the image on the coated part after the transfer. Discuss your requirements with your powder supplier for more information on this process. —N.L.
Q: We’re spraying some of our parts with a hybrid silver metallic, and we’re getting some black spots on some areas of the parts. What could be the cause of this? R.S., Toronto, Ont.
Black spots? Hard to say. There could be many reasons. Try spraying out a panel of virgin material to see if the black spots occur. If spots don’t appear, this should eliminate the fresh powder. Then spray out a sample of reclaim powder and check that panel. Do both of these tests on clean panels. Do you see the spots in the uncured powder or after baking? These tests should point you in a direction to proceed. Don’t rely on looking at production parts. Run the tests with absolutely clean test panels. —G.T.
Q: We’re getting outgassing from 90-degree outward-facing corners on Galvannealed 16-gauge steel. This manifests as blisters in the cured powder coating. The steel is run through a 435°F dry-off oven after a nine-stage B-1000/99X pretreat system. The powder is cured at 405°F for 25 minutes. Is there anything we can do to help prevent the blistering? Please advise. M.B., Oak Creek, Wis.
The annealing process used in making Galvannealed steel is normally sufficient to eliminate outgassing experiences on zinc-coated steel. However, if you break or crack the surface of the annealed zinc, you can expose raw zinc that will out-gas. I suspect this is your problem, as the pinholes are seen only in areas that have outward-facing 90-degree corners. I suspect that the annealed zinc surface has been cracked during the forming of this corner in the brake press. You can confirm this with photo microscopy analysis of the raw steel after forming. The corrective action required here is change the radius of the 90-degree corner to something a bit more generous. —N.L.
Q: We’re installing an aluminum trellis system at a location that’s directly over the San Francisco Bay—about 10 feet above the bay, to be exact. The location gets sun and salt all day and all night. We’re concerned about long-term maintenance. We think that powder coating is the answer. What should the specifications be for an installation like this? The aluminum is the standard extruded 2×6 stock that is welded together. R.B., San Francisco, Calif.
Aluminum is great for this project if prepared correctly. The metal will need to be cleaned and conversion-coated prior to painting. And bear in mind that the parts should be coated immediately after the conversion coating. Aluminum is a self-preserving metal. If you clean it, then let it sit around for hours, it will begin to re-coat itself for it’s own protection, and you’ll need to re-clean it.
A good TGIC-based (triglycidyl isocyanurate) polyester powder will be a great final touch. You should expect upwards of 5,000 hours salt spray resistance with this combination, but the key is proper pretreatment. Just powder coating won’t do it, and you’ll probably be called back to repair whatever it is you installed. —G.T.
Q: Is orange peel acceptable in the finish? Or is it a bad job? T.H., Horsham, Pa.
Orange peel can be attributed to either the powder formulation or application problems. Every powder-coated finish has a surface roughness that can be compared with known visual standards, available from the Powder Coating Institute (PCI Smoothness Standards). These standards are numbered 1 through 10, and each one has a different degree of orange peel. Every powder formulation has an inherent amount of orange peel (or conversely, smoothness) based upon its formulation properties. Some powders are formulated will very little orange peel (high smoothness) to provide a highly decorative surface. Other powders are formulated with a lot of orange peel to hide surface flaws.
Powder formulators control orange peel by controlling the flow rate of the coating during the curing operation. Powders with high flow characteristics flow into smoother coatings before they set and crosslink. Powders with inhibited flow characteristics will have limited flow during cure and produce remarkably more orange peel.
The first thing you should do is to compare the finish on your part with the panel from the powder company or to the PCI orange peel standard noted in the technical data sheet from the powder supplier. Are they the same? If not, then there may be an application problem that is causing excessive orange peel. These problems may be insufficient ground causing back ionization or a film build that is too thin or too thick. Furthermore, the cure oven may be setting the powder before it has had a chance to flow out completely, causing excessive orange peel. If the orange peel on your part is the same as the panel or PCI standard, then you selected the wrong powder formulation and there are no application problems. —N.L.
Q: We are a manufacturer of farm equipment in Canada with our machinery primarily built from standard tubing, pipe, bar, and parts laser cut from hot rolled 44W plate. We’ve recently switched our primary color to yellow, and now edge coverage, especially on the laser-cut parts, has become more of an issue than ever. Our shot blasting process alone won’t round the edges well enough. We have cut down the cure time on the powder to an absolute minimum, but the powder still won’t cover the sharp edges. What kind of machinery or tools are available to take the work out of rounding the edges of these components to allow the powder to cover better? We’re currently using angle grinders, but the process is slow, dirty, and tiring. Any suggestions? D.B., Gerald, Sask.
Ah, the laser gives a nice neat cut, doesn’t it? But it sure is tough to paint. Small parts can be placed in a tumbler, and that’s usually enough to take care of the problem. However, if your pieces are large, a tumbler probably isn’t practical. I don’t know of any tooling designed for this purpose, other than the usual grinders and sanders. You don’t need a ½-inch radius on the edges, but the greater it is, the less of an issue will be the black line. —G.T.
Q: We currently outsource all our coating. Not an ideal situation, but something that we have to live with for now. The units we’re coating are fairly large storage units: 1.0 meter wide by 1.0 meter deep by 0.5 meter tall. The units in question are coated a semi-gloss black. The powder requirements we give our supplier are fairly simple in regards to performance standards. The powder being used is an epoxy-polyester hybrid. The question is concerning the top for the unit (1 meter by 1 meter). Underneath the surface running from right to left is a support channel (u-channel) about 75 millimeters wide. The finish is what it should be for the majority of the surface, a semi-gloss black. However, on the surface above the support channel, the finish has a noticeably higher gloss. Noticeable enough to appear as a high-gloss stripe running from right to left in the center of the unit. I’m stumped. Any idea what could be causing this? J.A., Guangdong, China
Your problem is caused by curing issues. The area on the cabinet you describe has additional mass from the support channel. Additional mass means more energy required to cure this area than the surrounding areas. Because most powder coatings have inherent over-bake resistance (up to 100 percent), your contractor needs to cure the product at either a higher temperature for the same amount of time or at the same temperature for a longer period of time. The surrounding areas will be slightly over-baked, but as long as they aren’t cured beyond the inherent over-bake resistance of the powder, you won’t have any problems, and the part will look the same on all surfaces. —N.L.
Q: When we spray black powder, it comes out with a milky looking coating on it that will wipe off. What could be the cause of this? We’re running at 10 feet per minute at 375°F, and the parts are in the oven for 35-45 minutes. The parts get the milky look to them when they’re about 40 feet out of the oven. When they first come out, they’re nice and glossy. Do you think I need to turn up the heat and slow down the line? Our powder supplier recommended 400°F at 6.5 feet per minute. The parts are heavy 2½-inch round solid steel bar stock 36 inches long. D.S., Assumption, Ill.
If you haven’t already, ask your powder supplier to bring in an oven chart recorder to get some data from the oven. You should have four probes: one for air temperature and three others for high, low, and mid-point locations. See how long it takes for the parts to get to temperature and how long the actual cure time is.
I can’t figure out how the coating could exude a material that would wipe away after cure. This type of problem is almost always due to some external contamination. Have you tried looking at the defects under a good microscope? If the particles can be wiped away, my guess is the supplier is going to claim it’s external, and not the powder.
You might be overbaking. Heavy-gauge parts will continue to cure after exiting the oven, so if they’re in the oven for more than the recommended cure, and then continue to cure for a few minutes outside, that may be the problem, but I’m just kind of shooting in the dark. Good luck. —G.T.
Q: I nylon-coat stainless steel and aluminum brackets/lids. In my process, we heat the metal in a conveyor oven. Once the parts exit the oven, we hook the parts through a hole and dip them in four to 13 up and down cycles in the nylon powder. The nylon powder is contained in a fluid bed supplied with air. I’m looking for a ways to eliminate drilling open the holes and preventing uneven powder buildup around the hook area. C.L., Greenwood, Ind.
The fluidized bed dip method of applying powder coating has been around for a long time. In fact, it was the most popular way to apply powder coatings until the mid 1960’s. However, dipping operations have several issues that you express in your questions.
First, you need to have a hang hole to hold the part. Second, coating thickness is affected by the time the part spends in the fluid bed and by the depth the part is immersed in the bed. Fluid beds have denser powder lower in the bed than they have at the top of the bed. Add the fact that the lower part areas are first to go in and last to come out, resulting in more time in the bed, you’ll always have more coating thickness at the bottom of the part than at the top. This situation is further complicated when you heat parts to flow the powder, which causes gravity to pull more powder toward the bottom of the part. Unfortunately, these issues are ruled by physics and cannot be significantly mitigated.
As for buildup within a hole, you can always use a masking plug to prevent the coating from entering the hole. This will be difficult to insert, however, given that the hanger is also in the hole. Using a hanger with a shoulder or taper to fill the hole may work. Give it a try. —N.L.
Q: What I would like to find is an adhesive tab that will adhere to the top, middle, and bottom of a rack to see what temperature the material has achieved without the use of a computer to go into a 400°F gas-fired cure convection oven. I saw these on the market some time ago but haven’t seen anything like this lately. S.C., Summerville, S.C.
You don’t have to check metal temperatures on everything you cure. If you run the temperature recorder through the oven with a particular part at the correct line speed or dwell time, and then record that, the next time you run that part, you set everything the same, and you’re ready to go. And you can always check cure once the parts cool by rubbing the part with methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) for a number of times. If any readers know of “heat tabs,” maybe they’ll let us know about them so that we can pass on the information. —G.T.
Q: Can passivated sheet steel be powder-coated and have good adhesion? What process can be used to prep the surface of passivated materials before applying powder coating? Or is this not recommended? Thanks. J.S., York, Pa.
Passivation is a process that employs acids to remove impurities on the surface of the steel. If this was performed at the steel mill, then the steel was coated with oil to prevent rusting during transit and fabrication, making the surface unsuitable for powder coating without first cleaning the surface. If this process is performed in-house, after all manufacturing activities, then it may be OK to powder coat as is.
Successful powder coating requires a properly cleaned surface for adhesion. Often, pretreatment systems are employed to improve the corrosion resistance of the product and further promote adhesion. Pretreatment systems for steel often use a combination of cleaners, iron or zinc phosphate or zirconium, and so on not only to clean the surface but also to improve adhesion by increasing the surface texture with crystallization on the surface. Discuss your application and product corrosion requirements with your pretreatment chemical supplier to determine the best method of preparing your steel surface before powder coating. This is the only way to ensure that you get the results you and your customer expect. —N.L.
Q: We powder coated an auto frame that had been sanded. No other prep work was done on the frame. It was baked at 350°F. The results were satisfactory when under our lights and natural outdoor light. When the customer took the frame to his shop and did another inspection, we were able to detect light spots where we could see the metal. Any suggestions? H.H., Moorhead, Minn.
Did you wipe down the frame after sanding? I’d like to assume that you would know you needed to do that, but it can’t hurt to ask. With no other metal prep, you probably won’t have very good adhesion of the powder- or any paint-to the frame.
On the surface (no pun intended), it would seem that you have an issue with the powder’s capability to cover the base metal at certain film builds. The first thing you should do is a film-thickness check in more than several places. If you can see through the finish at a film thickness of less than 1.5 mils, then you don’t have enough coating. If the film thickness is thicker than that, then you may have a powder formulation problem. Don’t do anything until you know what the powder film thickness is! —G.T.
Q: In my tank, the degreaser solution is turning into a purple solution. What can be causing this? We use an alkaline degreaser that is designed to work under temperatures between 45°C to 60°C. E.E., Coahuila, Mexico
Pretreatment chemistries are all proprietary formulas developed by each chemical company. This fact makes it extremely difficult to guess what has happened to your chemical bath to change the color. The only way you can sort through this problem is discuss it with the chemical company that supplies your facility. They know what is in the formula and what would cause the color change. —N.L.
Q: One of our spray guns had excessive sparking, and a brief flash fire took place. We were recoating parts when this happened. What was the possible cause? R.S., Lincoln, Nebr.
The flash fire was probably caused by poor ground. The first coat on the part insulates it. As a result, it’s highly possible that the hanger didn’t have a good grounding surface due to the first coat, and the electrostatics had to do something. You might want to cut the kilovolts a bit on the recoats, but it sounds to me like you had no ground. —G.T.
Q: I have been having major issues trying to paint with Sky White powder coating. While painting this color, and only this color, we are having multiple fisheyes across the part, which is a flat piece of galvanneal (16 inches by 16 inches). Parts are going through an eight-stage washer and manually coated using new equipment. After we had a 100 percent reject rate out of 100 parts, we sanded with 240 grit and resent the parts through the washer using only our last stage (RO rinse) to rinse the parts. On the repaints before cure, we did not see any flaws suspect of creating any defects. After the cure oven, we had the same issue with multiple fisheyes across the part. We also ran a lab Q panel with the run and this also had fisheyes. We paint 20 different colors in our shop and this is the only color that gives us problems. Any input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. T.F., Milwaukee, Wis.
Considering that you experienced the same problem on the test panel as you did on the actual parts, this leads me to believe that your problems are not substrate or pretreatment related. We can eliminate oil contamination in your compressed air, as that would cause the problem with all your powders.
Having said that, I believe your problem is not related to the “sky white” color but to the actual powder formulation itself. Some powders are highly incompatible with others, causing fisheyes. For instance, mixing epoxy and polyester or acrylic and polyester powders will cause fisheyes. Check with your material supplier to find out if this is your problem and isolate or change the materials to eliminate the fisheyes. —N.L.
Q: What is the perfect temperature and humidity for a powder coating application and storage room? Thanks for any help. K.T., Spring Lake, Mich.
Well, it depends. If the application area isn’t air conditioned, and it gets pretty warm there in the summer, keeping the powder in a cool place can cause some condensation. However, if you have air conditioning for the spray booth, then the powder should be stored in an air-conditioned area as well.
The standards have always been to maintain relative humidity between 40 percent and 60 percent, and temperature between 60°F and 85°F. Personally, I like about 55 percent humidity and about 75°F. However, many people will argue both sides of that.
About half of all powder coating systems aren’t air conditioned at all. You’ll probably have trouble if the humidity in the area is more than 65 percent. Temperature isn’t quite so critical, depending on the gel temperature of the powder you use. I know of places where powder has been applied when ambient temperatures were in the high 90s, but the powders used were slow-gel and high-bake-temperature powders. Automotive plants applying full powder coatings have been controlling humidity in the upper 60 percent range. I don’t agree with this, but it works, probably because those plants spend a fortune for controls to closely monitor temperature and humidity. The average industrial coating shop can’t afford to have all of that sophisticated equipment. Just don’t keep the powder stored in a real cool and dry place and then take it to a hot and humid area because you will get condensate. —G.T.
Q: I have a question regarding oven exhaust. As we all know, oven exhaust is necessary during paint and powder curing processes. But, does it matter where the exhaust blower is located? Also, if the recommended temperature of the oven is about 220°F for 20 minutes, what should be the temperature of the exhaust blower duct? Thanks. K.R., Maharashtra, India
Cure oven exhaust can be located anywhere within the oven chamber where it least affects the oven’s interior temperature. Often an exhaust opening can create a “cool spot,” depending upon the volume exhausted, so positioning it where is causes the least problems is best. The air exiting an oven exhaust fan will be the same temperature of the oven itself. —N.L.
Q: We powder coat 7-foot-long aluminum C channels that are 1-inch by 3-inch by 1-inch. We want to spray numbers on the 1-inch channels on 1 3/4-inch centers over the length of the 7-foot-long rail. We picture an ink spray printer of some sort. Any ideas? J.F., Anaheim, Calif.
Do you want the numbers to be permanently affixed to the parts, over the powder coating? Ink could certainly work for what you are trying to do. Another suggestion would be silk screening. Some screening paints and inks require baking, while others require air drying, depending on what you want them to do. You also could try stenciling, although all of these methods are so alike that they’re almost the same process. The coating, of course, is the key. You want to avoid a second bake, although judiciously placed infrared lamps could work well for curing the coating. —G.T.
Q: My powder coating department is looking for ways to save money. I’ve found that when we coat hooks that hang on racks (to improve conveyor density), 25 to 30 percent of the powder sprayed for that specific job is going to the racks. Is there a way to coat the racks or cover them so that the powder won’t adhere, yet still provide a ground? I’ve been working with multiple vendors who haven’t had anyone approach them before regarding this, so I’m looking for help with this. N.A., Rockford, Ill.
Proper hanger design is the key to good productivity and reduced costs. However, if you have 25 to 30 percent of the powder attracted to the hanger and not the parts, then you don’t have a good hanger design. Coating the hanger to reduce the powder attraction (like they do in plating operations) is the wrong way to correct this problem.
Start with the basics of good hanger design. First, select a hanger stock that’s a significantly smaller target than the actual part being coated, but make sure it’s thick enough to safely support your part’s weight. Second, present the part to the application gun(s) as the best target, and shield the hanger (not the other way around). Third, use a contact point on your part that will shield the hanger contact from overspray to ensure a reliable part ground. Finally, densely hang your parts on the hangers to ensure there is more part surface than hanger surface that the powder will be attracted to. Just don’t let the parts overlap. —N.L.
Q: We are a small batch-style shop that uses a complete five-stage, high-pressure, hand-wand prep system. We are shooting a customer’s product with a tribocharging gun from a fluidizing pot. The oven is gas-fired convection, and we are curing at 400°F. We used a temperature recorder to track oven temperature and learned that we have only a slight variance in temperature. Recently, the coating on parts we sprayed with some portions of a powder coating batch seemed to appear (or at least to the naked eye) a bit glossier than the coating on parts we sprayed with other portions of the batch. Here is the question: Is this possible, and if it is, what would make this possible? Is there anything during the process (from prep to cure) that could have this effect on a powder? Or is it just our eyes? We are shooting polyester on this project and using prep chemicals from a well-known supplier. T.S., Edmonton, Alta.
A glossy appearance on the part sounds like undercure. You’ve checked the oven, and it seems to be OK. The only way you can get spotty undercure is if the part is configured in a way that causes the heat to be absorbed by other areas of the part. Having said that, it sounds to me as if you have a bad batch of powder. This is based on what you did and didn’t say. You said “this batch,” so I’m assuming that you haven’t noticed this phenomenon previously. The coating appearance should be uniform, not glossy in some areas. I would tell your powder guy to send in a fresh batch of powder. —G.T.
Q: One of our customers uses pure polyester powder for automotive components and conducts a hot water test. The customer keeps the components in 158°F (70°C) water for 1 hour and then does the crosshatch adhesion test. The customer is complaining of peel off in the crosshatch test. We have checked the pretreatment concentration and found it to be OK. Even the curing of the powder film is OK. Could you let me know what may be the cause of the problem? J., Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Just because you checked the chemistry in the pretreatment, doesn’t mean that it’s functioning correctly. For instance, the pretreatment chemical may not be formulated to remove all the surface contaminants and soils on the parts that are being processed. Second, the pretreatment may be applying too much conversion coating (iron phosphate, chromate conversion, etc.), causing a powdery surface. Third, the process parameters may be totally off (tank temperature, dwell time, pressure, etc.). In each of these cases, the pretreatment chemical may be totally in balance, but the end result on the part is still a failure. These situations can drive a process person crazy trying to sort out things.
The only definitive way to determine causation of failure is analytical testing. These tests may include Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, energy dispersive x-ray (EDX) analysis, gas chromatography, photo microscopy, and so on. These tests are expensive but can separate contaminants from the coating material, pretreatments, and substrate, leaving the culprit clearly identified. You can expect to spend between $5,000 and $10,000 for the test and analysis. If the customer is worth saving, then this investment is easily worth it. —N.L.
Q: I have a question about primer. We’re powder coating some fence made of heavy steel, and cast knobs. The panels are sandblasted and then sprayed with a steel pretreatment. Do we need to apply a powder coat primer before we put the final powder coat on? The final coat is a fluorocarbon-based powder coating. Thanks very much. M.H., Portsmouth, R.I.
I don’t know. Is the fence used outside anywhere in the country? If you don’t want to take down fence that has been installed, and is still in warranty (depending upon your warranty), you would be advised to use something like a zinc rich powder primer. And be certain that the coating is thorough. I know of fence jobs that have been poorly coated, and when moisture got into the interior of the steel posts, they bled rust all over a concrete wall. The owner of the wall said to the fence company “fix it.” It almost broke the fence company!
You have a choice. Do a complete coating job with the added primer or electro-coat the posts and any other hollow pieces, then powder coat. Or maybe you’re in a market that isn’t quite so particular. —G.T.
Q: We currently coat (white epoxy hybrid) ferrous copper infiltrated powder metal (alloy FX-2008-T) components and occasionally experience unacceptable surfaces that show outgassing characteristics. We degas at elevated temperatures above our cure temperature as part of our normal process to reduce this. Our powder metal supplier provided a vacuum resin impregnated product (after copper infiltration), but this didn’t perform any better. We have read articles about powder formulations that provide degassing properties before crosslinking but would like to know more about their use and performance. Are there other processes that can assist us in eliminating the problem? P.B., Jamestown, N.Y.
Powder coating powdered metal substrates can be problematic. These substrates can be very porous and contain a variety of contaminant that will gas during the powder cure operation. You’ve tried preheating the parts and asking your supplier to vacuum impregnate them with a sealer. Those are the two easiest solutions. Now you want to try outgassing-formulated powder coatings, one of the few alternatives left.
Powder coatings formulated to reduce outgassing come in most of the base resins currently available on the market. The formulator designs the coating to remain in the liquid state during cure for a prolonged period of time to allow the entrapped gas to escape before crosslinking into the final hardened product. This means that the coating can cause a sag, or run, easily if the film thickness isn’t controlled. It also means that the coating can flow away from edges, reducing coverage in these areas. Otherwise, there are no obvious issues with using these outgassing coatings as a replacement for standard powder coatings. —N.L.
Q: We’re presently using a graphite-based conveyor lubricant on our hang line. I believe it’s causing excess trash. Do you know of a lubricant that won’t cause this problem? D.S., Halls, Tenn.
I’m uncertain as to what you mean by trash, but I assume you mean you’re getting droppings onto the newly coated parts, which in turn create rejects. Should I also assume that the conveyor runs on the outside of the washer and doesn’t pass inside? Sometimes, if you use a conveyor guard, you can get just enough wash action or heat from a washer to clean off the excess oil and trash. Are you applying lubricants by manual or automatic methods? Sometimes you need to adjust the automatic applicators, and sometimes the manual applicators apply too much lubricant. Many companies install a set of horizontal wire brushes that loosen the trash, which then falls away before entry to the washer. Whatever hits the parts is removed in the washer. Of course, each thing that you add to the system creates more maintenance needs. One of the better means of protecting the parts from conveyor droppings is by using drip pans. However, the pans would mean you’d need to redesign your hangers. This may be difficult, depending on booth and oven heights. To answer your question directly, no, I don’t know specifically of a lubricant that won’t create excess dirt, but I do know there are ways of taking care of the problem without resorting to exotic lubricants. —G.T.
Q: I notice that when I have my vehicles serviced, there is an additional charge for shop supplies. Also, when visiting my doctor, I have seen a sign posted announcing they are now adding to the bill a small charge for miscellaneous/office supplies. Most businesses automatically include shop, office, and miscellaneous material costs in their totals, so consumers never see these charges added to their bills. Why, then, would you purposely choose to show an additional charge that would be tacked on to the cost of doing business? More specifically, should a powder coating business do the same thing? Trying to keep up with today’s business economy, a shop must grasp any opportunity to offset the everyday unseen cost. I would not want to run off any business, but, then again, if everyone else is doing this, why not us? R.W., Ridge Spring, S.C.
Another business model that comes to mind where add-on fees are prevalent is the airline industry. However, most frequent fliers are becoming more and more upset about being nickel and dimed to death with fees for baggage, flight changes, meals, drinks, peanuts, bathrooms, preferred seating, etc. There are no typical add-on fees that I have seen used by other custom coaters. However, most do charge for pick-up and delivery of parts, special handling charges, assembly, and storage, among others. I’ve found that the most successful custom coaters provide numerous value-added benefits to their customers, including fabrication, silk screening, assembly, storage, and distribution in one rolled-up price. This method ensures that the customer would be hard-pressed to compare prices with other coaters that did not offer all the same services in a one-stop shop. Providing itemized pricing for each service would, however, make comparison shopping much easier. Identifying and separately pricing individual services would just be giving away your strategy to your competitors, allowing them to underbid you more easily. —N.L.
Q: I’m using a clear nylon liquid primer to pretreat a metal fastener. The whole fastener is getting primed, but only the head and shank get coated with a black nylon powder. What’s the ideal method for applying the primer? Can I prime the parts by using a dip-and-spin-dry method? Will this give me a uniform primed surface? This is step one in my education of liquid primers combined with powder coatings. R.S., Macomb Township, Mich.
You’re using the liquid primer to prep the metal fastener? By doing this, you’re assuming that there are very few contaminants on the fasteners and that the liquid primer will cover or merge with those soils and form a good base for the powder coating. Is the part clean enough to apply the powder directly and eliminate the primer? The dip-and-spin method can work if you adjust the dry time of the primer so that it leaves a smooth finish; however, an airdried liquid certainly doesn’t give very good properties. If you apply a powder coating over that, it’s kind of like putting vinyl siding on a mud hut. The first thing that will fail will be the air-dried liquid primer. Are you sure that all of the solvents are out of the primer by the time you apply and cure the powder? Do you have any popping defects in the cured surface? You can certainly apply the powder over the liquid primer if they’re compatible. Spinning the part will give you a fairly smooth undercoat. You may also want to try spraying but that will require some type of booth to contain the overspray. You could use a spray gun about the size of an airbrush. With a chain-on-edge system, you could put the part on a spinning spindle as you spray the powder. This way, you can include the powder application and oven on one line. I hope this helps. —G.T.
Q: I am having a base material bleed through on light colors. Can I stop this by applying a primer first? If so, should I bake the primer before applying the color or can the primer and color be baked at the same time? I’ve never used primer before. V.A., Houston, Tex.
If you are not getting the hiding power from the powder coating you are using, the two easiest solutions are:
1. Select a coating with better hiding power at the film thickness you desire. Hiding power is an appearance property that can be formulated and adjusted by your supplier to achieve the desired results.
2. Apply two coats of your coating to achieve the desired coverage and hiding power. This approach is preferred, as using a primer can be problematic since not all formulations are compatible with each other or have sufficient intercoat adhesion. Using two coats of the same material is the low-risk approach to achieving the same goal. You will have to partially cure (B-stage) the first coat, which means only using half the cure time recommended by the formulator on the first coat. Recoat the entire part and cure both coats together to the correct cure time to fully cure the coating. —N.L.
Q: What’s the best way to apply zinc-rich primer and a polyester powder topcoat? I’m concerned about finish smoothness and powder adhesion between the two coats. D.V., Birdsboro, Pa.
You can get zinc-rich primers in powder material. The best way to apply these is to spray them and keep the film build at the minimum that the supplier recommends for the performance of the parts you’re coating. You should also make your supplier aware that you’ll be applying a polyester topcoat over the primer so that your supplier knows the two powders must be compatible. You should also apply the second coat as thin as your specs will allow. The thin coating will help reduce orange peel, particularly if finish smoothness is a priority, as you noted. Any other means of application will likely cause some erratic films that will make your finish less smooth than you’d like it to be. Inner-coat adhesion shouldn’t be an issue. However, I suggest you make a note of what exposure parts have to contaminants, such as dirt in the air between applications. Some shops apply a base or primer coat then allow the parts to sit around before applying the second coat. If you don’t protect the pieces, you run the risk of getting dirt or other foreign matter, such as oily, grimy air particulates, on the base coat. If you don’t clean the parts before applying the second coat, you may have inner-coat adhesion problems. —G.T.
Q: I have a big issue with peeling on aluminum. Our products are poles: The base part is casting and the body is extrusion. Somehow, the problem is only at the extrusion part (or to be exact, 90 percent of the claims). Which test can I do to try to find the reason? We have immersion tanks, which are degreaser, rinse, iron phosphate, rinse, and seal. We run aluminum, steel, and cast iron. (We have the same process for steel but different tanks.) We load the conveyor by hand, and we use only one oven to preheat and cure the pieces. We preheat the pieces to degas, but how much is enough because sometimes the pieces are really hot? We’re using polyester powder coating. The other issue is we have an electrostatic booth, but because the pieces come out of the preheat too hot, when we apply the powder coating, it’s almost cured. V.K., Tamaulipas, Mexico
The pretreatment system you describe can be ineffective on your aluminum parts. Aluminum has an oxide that readily forms on the surface in the presence of oxygen. As oxygen is in the air (it’s what keeps us alive), exposed aluminum surfaces always have this oxide layer. The amount of oxide can directly affect adhesion of the powder coating you’re applying because it’ll break from the aluminum easily, taking the coating with it.
Acid-based chemicals are best-suited to remove the oxide. The iron phosphate tank uses phosphoric acid to produce an iron phosphate on ferrous-based metals but has no effect on aluminum. Hydrofluoric acid, often referred to as a fluoride additive, is much more effective at removing the aluminum oxide. Your chemical supplier can reformulate the chemical in the iron phosphate tank to better etch the aluminum, and your problems should go away.
Now I know you’re asking: Why doesn’t this aluminum oxide cause adhesion problems on the cast aluminum parts? The answer has to do with surface roughness. The extrusion aluminum parts are smooth, and any impediments to adhesion are going to cause adhesion problems. However, the cast aluminum parts have some surface roughness (tooth) for the coating to bite onto and are therefore less subject to impediments to adhesion. This brings up another way to solve your problem, mechanical surface preparation by either sanding or media blasting. Either of these methods will remove the aluminum oxide and provide surface tooth for better adhesion. Just remember to process the parts quickly through all your pretreatment and powder coating operations to prevent the aluminum oxide from building too greatly after mechanical surface preparation. —N.L.
Q: I’ve been trying to perfect my gloss-black parts by using less powder, but my parts still come out with orange peel. I’ve mentioned to my boss that maybe the curing time is too long and the temperature is too hot. Could you please help? D.A., Wilmington, Del.
In your case, the thinner the film, the more prominent the orange peel. You’ll never be rid of orange peel in powder coating, it’s just a matter of how much orange peel you’re willing to put up with on the parts you’re finishing. Your powder coatings supplier can help you diminish the orange-peel effect by supplying you with a fine-grind powder. You’ll pay more for it. You also may have fluidizing and atomizing problems, which can mean a lot of reclaim. As far as the time-and-temperature formula, you should be curing to the powder manufacturer’s specifications, so you really don’t have any latitude that way. —G.T.
Q: Our powder coater has been having problems powder coating our parts and has been burning off the powder coating sometimes more than once for the same part. Our parts are chair frames and are made out of 1-inch, 14-gauge carbon steel tubing. Some of the parts on the chairs are cast aluminum unions that fit into the tubing. What is the process and temperatures of burn off? How do burn off and temperatures affect the metal and aluminum? D.J., White Bear Lake, Minn.
The metal is heated between 800°F to 1,000°F during the burn-off process. Normally, this temperature won’t affect steel or aluminum, providing it’s not heat-treated or tempered. If for instance you’re using a tempered aluminum (6061 T6, with the T6 standing for the temper) the burn-off process will anneal (soften) the aluminum. However, if you’re using mil-grade materials, not tempered aluminum or heat-treated steels, then you should be fine. Never burn-off powder from magnesium as a tremendous fire will occur. —N.L.
Q: We have a high-temperature burn-off oven to burn off items that are to be recoated. The old powder coating is burned right down to the metal. Sometimes, when we recoat these items, the recoat will crack, and the coating separates from the metal and peels off in large chunks. Any idea what causes this? W., Shelburne, N.S.
I have several questions for you. Are you washing off the ash residue left by the burn-off? What temperature are you operating the burn-off oven at? You could be affecting the tensile strength of the metal, which is causing it to move a bit (surface tension), and the powder isn’t ready to be moved, so it pulls away. What temperature are you curing the powder at? Is it to spec? Are you pretreating the metal before recoating? If you are doing all of these things, then we need to take another approach. But make sure you are doing all of these things first. —G.T.
Q: I’ve been struggling with our powder coating vendor on a way to properly prepare the surface of gold-plated aluminum. The powder we’re using is a low-temperature cure because of some solder on the unpainted surface of the aluminum. The gold plating doesn’t serve a purpose on the painted surface; it’s simply too costly in time and labor to mask off areas of the aluminum prior to plating. Our process so far is to use DOD-P-15328 wash-primer prior to coating. I don’t know what cleaner is being used, and I’d prefer to NOT use that wash-primer if I could get around it. The coating isn’t adhering well, and all parts have chips in the finish near the masked edges. I appreciate any help you can provide. S.S., Salt Lake City, Utah
The wash primer you reference (DOD-P-15328) is formulated to improve adhesion on clean substrates, especially aluminum. The operative word here is clean. Clean aluminum means no organic soils (oils, waxes, fingerprints, etc.) or inorganic soils (aluminum oxide) on the surface. If either of these soils are present, you’ll have adhesion problems with the powder coatings, and the wash primer won’t help much.
Adhesion problems at the masked edges are caused by inadequate cure and high film build. Correct these two issues, including improving your cleaning method, and your problem will go away. —N.L.
Q: I’m new in the powder industry, and I would like to know what type of fire protection is needed in a manual-style powder booth. I’ve seen automated powder booths, and they’re equipped with ultraviolet-light (UV-light) detectors. My new employer said that because they’re not grounded to the conveyor and they’re grounded from part to part, no protection is needed. This is a modified wet paint booth with a conveyor running through it. Please advise. D.R., Goshen, Ind.
The law says that in a manual booth you don’t need UV detection. The theory is that if a spark occurs, a manual operator will be smart enough to release the gun trigger and stop the flow of powder. That’s assuming an awful lot! However, local codes will prevail, although I’ve never seen this particular part of the codes modified.
Fire suppression is another matter. Many local codes require sprinklers in the powder booth, in the collector, and wherever else the fire inspector wants them, per interpretation of the municipal codes in the area. Based on what you describe, you should be compliant. —G.T.
Q: My foam is not adhering to my powder coated parts. What factors could be causing this issue? Thanks. K.A., Windsor, Ont.
Many powder formulations contain wax additives, Teflon slip agents, and other things that can prevent adhesives from working. This is the very reason you need to work with the supplier of the coating to obtain a coating that provides the performance and appearance you need without causing adhesion issues with post applied materials such as tape, labels, foam, mastic, etc.
However, try wiping the powder coated surface with denatured alcohol to remove any surface contaminants before applying your adhesives. If this works, the problem may not be in the coating formula but in your process. —N.L.
Q: I am a building surveyor and have a project in which some powder-coated balustrades have been damaged down to the bare metal. Can the finish be repaired in situ, and how can it be done? I would be most grateful for any advice you can offer. J.H., Chichester, West Sussex, UK
You have two options for the repair of the damaged goods. Your choice will be heavily influenced by the situation with the parts; that is, whether or not they are installed in their final resting place. The options are to recoat with powder or to touch up with a color-matched liquid.
Now, there are several qualifiers to recoating with powder. Should that be the choice, you would have to recoat the entire part. A powder coated part is difficult to spot repair because the second coat leaves a halo at the repaired area, creating an unacceptable appearance. Several other factors also enter the picture. A second coat will accentuate the orange-peel appearance, and finite details, such as embossments, will be camouflaged by the heavy powder film thickness.
Touching up with a liquid is a perfectly normal and acceptable way to repair a powder coated part. Be certain that the repair area is well-sanded or buffed and that the touch-up is a good quality coating. You may want to use an automotive repair procedure, which includes a liquid prep application before applying the final coating. This would give a bit of metal protection to any exposed substrate. Is the spot repair area as good as the original coating? Nope, it never is, regardless of the chemistry of the original coating, but sometimes you don’t have a choice. —G.T.
Q: I work for a company that builds mini dumpers, scissors, cranes, and related equipment. They seem to think that by putting three different metals (castings, sink, and metal) into the same washer (phosphate wash), it can all be processed together as a batch. After the wash, the metals all have to be blown off and put into ovens for 12 minutes, put back in the oven for 2.5 minutes, have a top coat applied, and finally get put back in the oven for 19 minutes. The company uses the same oven temperature on all of the work, which I think is ridiculous, but they think works perfectly fine. I am having trouble with the metal, mainly because all of the metals are on the same frame. When it gets through this batch process, there are two powder coatings on the same frame, so you are getting a buildup of powder and it is cracking when the bolts are being applied. Have you got any useful tips to help? T.E., Coleshill, Birmingham
It is desirable to simplify a process as much as possible to ensure the obtained results are the same. While the batch process you describe can allow for different oven setpoints for different metal components, this methodology can lead to mistakes. Simplifying the process with common oven temperatures and cure times is often preferred to reduce the chance of error. This can be accomplished because most powder coating formulas have significant over-bake resistance (up to 100 percent), meaning that the coating can be in the oven at the designated metal temperature for twice as long as shown on the cure curve. This allows lighter (thinner and smaller gauge) parts to be over-cured, while heavier (thicker and larger gauge) parts are just barely cured at the same oven settings and metal temperature, without degradation of coating properties or appearance.
Of course, there are limits to the amount of simplification one can use in developing powder coating recipes. For instance, if the common oven settings do not allow the heavy parts to be properly cured without keeping the lighter parts from becoming over-cured, then different recipes are required. In this case, changing either the oven temperature or oven time is much more desirable than changing both. You will have to separate the parts to be run in different batches to ensure the proper recipe is being used for the correct parts.
Now to correct your cracking problem. There are a couple of causes you should check on these problem parts. First is coating thickness, as thicker coatings will be more brittle than thinner coatings. Verify the coating thickness limits the powder formulation suppler recommends to attain the desired mechanical properties and stay within those limits.
Second, over- or under-cured powder coatings can exhibit brittleness. Verify that the coating is properly cured or make the appropriate adjustments to prevent over- or under-cured coatings. —N.L.
Q: Any suggestions on how to powder coat a 1-by-4 steel grating used in an exterior application and keep it from rusting? F.B., Centralia, Wash.
First, make very sure that the grating is properly prepped, cleaned, and free of any oil residue. This is especially important in the corners of the grating crossbars. Coating these parts will probably not be an automatic application. At best, it could be a combination of automatic with manual reinforcement. As you have probably figured out, all of the corner areas will not be friendly to coating. The Faraday cage effect will make this difficult. Keep the voltage low and the atomizing air low. You’ll have heavy film build on the flat surfaces in an effort to get to the corners.
Actually to start from scratch, consider using a fluidized bed and preheating the parts. Or preheat the parts before you spray the powder coating. This will enhance the coating possibilities. Tribocharging application would also work from an application standpoint, but you would have to use a powder that is formulated for it. That probably means you would have to acquire the proper equipment.
So, trying to stay within what I have to assume is your standard powder application equipment, I think you should try to preheat the part, use lower electrostatics and less air, and apply the powder in an automatic booth with manual reinforcement. —G.T.
Q: How fast (ideal time) should the substrate be heated to the specified temperature? D.N., Tamil Nadu, India
Heat-up time of the substrate to the desired cure metal temperature is referred to as bring-up time. Most powder coatings prefer a steep ramp-up of heat on the powder surface, as the electrostatic charge is significantly reduced with heat. Because the electrostatic charge is all that holds the powder onto the part after spraying, converting the solid powder coating to a liquid coating by using heat must happen as fast as possible. In fact, high intensity infrared systems often can completely cure a part in fewer than 30 seconds, so the rate of heat-up isn’t a significant concern. Be careful though. Fast-heating systems can be problematic because they can often overshoot and scorch the coating easily. Be sure you have proper control of your heating system, and you won’t have a problem. —N.L.
Q: How do I get more information on waste powder utilization? A., Auckland, New Zealand
I’m unaware of any single source of information about waste powder use. There used to be some companies, including one called Discount Powders in Grand Rapids, Mich., that sold used powder coatings. However, I’m uncertain if those companies still offer those services. You’d have to do your own research on that.
Some US states also offer used materials as part of their recycling programs. One company uses old powder coatings to mold into products. Be aware though that used powder coatings are likely contaminated with many different things, for example, dirt, hanger residue, maybe agglomerated powder, and so on.
Typically, there’s not much of a calling for it. The suppliers sure don’t want it back. It takes as much, if not more, effort to screen waste powder to make it usable as it takes to screen virgin material. I’m sure a few companies that just need a good solid coating without any appearance requirements might be able to use waste powder, but they would want to have some idea of the original user’s process to try to determine what contaminants could be present. —G.T.
Q: I have a customer who is making a formed sheet metal box. He wants the seams sealed shut because of airflow. Do you know of any caulking that can be applied before the coating process that will stick to powder and survive the curing cycle? The seam is very tight, so the caulking thickness has to be very thin (if applied properly and conservatively). Metal repair compounds have been mentioned, but the volume of parts makes them completely impractical. Is our best option to seal the seams after coating? Thanks. R.P., Spokane Valley, Wash.
The preferred practice is to seal the product after powder coating. This allows your customer to select mainstream sealants and caulks that will be unaffected by the cure cycle of the powder coating. Some caulks (silicones) present especially dramatic problems with the powder coating process and must be applied after coating to en sure error free powder coating. —N.L.
Q: I’m trying to paint some wheels that need to have two colors. I painted the base color and then masked the wheel as needed. The problem is the wheel lip is about 0.050 wide, making it very hard for the tape to stick and not letting any of the second color get by. Does anyone have any ideas? D.L., Grand Junction, Colo.
We can throw this open to readers that work with masking and see what comes to us. We’ll be glad to pass along any suggestions we get. You should look at masking devices other than tape. maybe you should make up a dummy section of wheel and hold that in place while applying the second coat. maybe it would be easier to apply the secondary coat first and have a better masking surface for the primary coating. I don’t know what you are trying to achieve with the primary coating. Is it there for protection to the substrate, or is it an appearance coating?
You can make masking devices that attach to a vacuum system and seal off the prepainted surface as well as draw the second coating away from the other surface. The opposite system works as well: Use compressed air to create a curtain. You’ll have to get creative to achieve what you need. There are a lot of companies out there that make masking devices, but if you have a special application, it may be more economical to fabricate your own. I would park the tape idea for a bit and see what other method you can come up with. —G.T.
Q: My neighbor has a powder coating business in his backyard, which is directly behind my house in Texas. We have watched him powder coat and sandblast things directly through his high-powered exhaust fan with no filter, which happens to be about 4 feet from my fence. It has gotten on our golf cart seats, motorcycles, cars, and more. Actually, the more we look, the more we find with his coatings on our belongings. It’s very inconsiderate, to say the least. Is there a way to get these coating and blasting materials off our stuff? Or should we contact an attorney to solve this matter? Help! M.E., Vidor, Tex.
Before you call a lawyer, call your local Fire Marshall! What your neighbor is doing is highly illegal and dangerous. Spraying powder coatings (a combustible dust) without a proper spray containment booth is against all NFPA and OSHA regulations and can cause a situation that is much more dangerous than the powder on your car. How about having an explosion that levels the garage or a fire that destroys his house and yours for an outcome?
You may need a lawyer to get your neighbor to repaint your car, as powder coatings are difficult to remove once they are baked in the Texas sun for a while. You can try having the finish rubbed out, but you may end up burning through the paint.
I would turn him into the local authorities. Tell them that NFPA 33 and General OSHA guidelines for combustible dust containment and control apply to the garage business next door. Every legitimate powder coating shop in the area will thank you and probably help you get him closed down. Good luck. —N.L.
Q: If I have to coat a metal part that must adhere to a PVC (polyvinyl chloride) surface, what kind of powder coating should I use? W.D., Pescara, Italy.
You used the word adhere, therefore I’m going to assume that means you’re using an adhesive to connect the two pieces (metal and PVC). From that viewpoint, I would use a low-to medium-gloss polyester or an acrylic of the same gloss rating. I don’t recommend an epoxy in part because you didn’t say how the pieces are to be used. If this is an outdoor application, the epoxy will chalk.
Actually, the key is, how do you expect the coating to perform? Will it be used inside or outside? Will there be exposure to a harsh atmosphere? Do you want scratch or mar resistance? What expectations are there for powder adhesion to the metal? Secondly, your choice of adhesive is as critical as the type of powder you use. If you’re using a different method, such as bolts or screws, to attach the PVC to the powder-coated part, then a resin choice isn’t a big deal. —G.T.
Q: I’m experiencing issues coating a nonconductive part. The process involves preheating the part prior to coating and then curing it. After cure, the part exhibits an uneven distribution of gloss where the edges are shinier than the center of the surface. What is the best way to maintain an even distribution of gloss? A.L., Vaughan, Ont.
Uneven gloss in a cure powder coating is most often caused by undercure or overcure and/or substrate surface contamination. Check your cure using the PCI Solvent Cure Test Procedure #8 to verify full cure. If the test results show an undercure situation, you can simply reheat the part to drive the coating to full cure. If the cure test results show pass, then you likely overcured the part and you will have to recoat it. You should always ensure that the substrate you are coating does not have any surface contaminants that may affect the appearance (including gloss) of your part. Simply checking your substrate before coating will prevent this as a cause of your problems.
What may not be as easy to determine is if some contaminants are being released from your substrate during cure. This can happen with some MDF wood products that sometimes have glue or resins that volatize when exposed to heat. This often shows as pinholes in the coating, but may also change gloss when the contaminant release is not as violent as to cause a pinhole in the coating. —N.L.
Q: We’re designing an aftermarket roof rack for automobiles and sport-utility vehicles. The rack will be made from tubular steel. We want an ultraviolet-resistant crinkle finish. What do you recommend for coating this product? Should we use a primer? M.K., Atascadero, Calif.
Given the use of the end product, I would think you would want to use a urethane polyester powder coating that could be supplied by quite a few powder coating companies. You shouldn’t need a primer if you ensure you’re cleaning the racks properly before coating them. The powder will adhere very well to a good clean part. Introducing a primer is an unnecessary expense. You always run the risk of having an intercoat adhesion problem. —G.T.
Q: I use a variety of powders, including acrylics, polyesters, and polyester‐urethane hybrids. Over the years, I have collected a lot of expired powder rising from the overspray. Is there any way to reuse, recycle, or get rid of this outdated powder? J.A., Evansville, Ind.
While there is a market for off-spec powder coatings of the same formulation and color, there is no commercial value for a mixture of reclaimed powder material comprised of many different colors and formulas. The different colors mixed and reused provide a speckled appearance in the coating. However, different formulations mixed and reused cause an incompatible chemical reaction that creates something but it is not a coating. First, verify that the powder coatings you collected do not contain hazardous materials using the MSDS information provided by the supplier. Next, check with your nonhazardous waste hauler for the proper disposal techniques for the material (i.e. powder or solid). If they want only solid bricks of powder, melt the waste powder in small quantities in noncombustible containers in your oven. —N.L.
Q: We’re looking at alternatives to painting steel shapes, such as H-beams, angles, and other configurations that are about 1 foot tall and wide and 40 feet long. Is powder coating a reasonable alternative? What are some of the pros and cons? J.B., Richmond, Va.
First of all, organic powder coating is paint. The difference between powder and other paints is in the manufacturing process and in powder’s dry ingredients. Application of liquid and powder paints is pretty much the same, as are cleaning and curing. If you’re currently coating 40-foot-long parts with a liquid, you can do it with a powder. You have to do some specific things to accommodate the length, but it has been done, and you can do it as well. You can use a commercial booth and apply powder the same way you apply a liquid, except with powder, you have the benefit of reclaiming the overspray. Handling in the oven can be a bit tricky, but it isn’t impossible. You might want to preheat the parts, and apply the powder when the part is hot. The issue here is difficulty in controlling film thickness. The rebar industry does this with induction heat. Of course, you may have some problems with Faraday cage effect, but you can overcome this with proper gun arrangement or by manual touch-up. Assuming a 40-foot-long piece is going to be fairly heavy-gauge steel, the heat sink of the oven may challenge your oven size, but if you’re currently heat-curing a liquid, it won’t be much different with powder. maybe you should consider flame-spray application. This will depend on the paint performance and appearance specification. I know of a company that powder coats outdoor and highway lighting poles and fixtures. It uses a special flow process in its shop. The process took up a lot of space, but it worked. The company has a much better coating than before, and their customers are happier, too. Actually, I think you have better choices in application methods with powder than you do with liquid. —G.T.
Q: How long do we have, in hours, to perform a crosshatch test after salt-spray tests are done on our parts? We use 1008/1010 low carbon wire, and after a five-stage, iron phosphate wash with a sealer, we expect 92 hours to 168 hours to pass. Parts are coated with epoxy or triglycidyl isocyanurate-based (TGIC-based) polyester powder 2 mils to 5 mils thick. Can we also perform a crosshatch and methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) rub test after the parts cool to room temperature? N.G., Angola, Ind.
Is this testing criteria customer-specified, and must it be performed concurrently?
Normally, these tests are performed on separate product or test panel samples. Accelerated corrosion testing (salt-spray testing) is tested to a predetermined time, and the coating is inspected for corrosion (creep, bleed, or blister). Performing a crosshatch adhesion test on a sample that was subjected to this corrosion test isn’t normally required. That doesn’t mean that your customer can’t specify this combined test, but it’s very unusual.
Crosshatch and MEK (solvent resistance) testing can be performed on different areas (virgin areas) of the same sample. But wait until the sample is cooled to room temperature (and then some). Waiting 24 hours before performing any testing is best to ensure the coating can take the punishment. —N.L.
Q: We’ve been asked to powder coat magnesium wheels. Can they be blasted with steel shot? D.A., Yorkville, Ill.
In a word, no. Steel shot will mar the surface of the wheel. Mag wheels are softer than steel wheels and are meant to have a near-chrome appearance to them. The current trend is to come very close to mimicking chrome, but some wheel suppliers also supply a satin finish. In any event, you don’t want to use steel media. Typically, you want to clean and polish. The polishing technique is usually by machine because buffing by hand will be very tiring, and with a sore arm will come irregularities in the polished surface. —G.T.
Q: During powder coating, we have observed powder being deposited onto our hangers and fixtures. Can we avoid this by using some type of special material on our fixtures? S.C., Maharastra, India
The short answer is no. Hangers must be made of conductive materials (for grounding) that can withstand the rigors of a powder coating operation (heat and ware load). This is why they make hanger maintenance products (burn-off ovens, chemical strippers, sand bed system, etc.). You can apply heat-resistant Mylar masking materials to the exposed hanger components, but this will be more expensive than stripping the hanger. Sorry, but hanger maintenance is part of powder coating. —N.L.
Q: We use a silver vein powder coating. At times, it comes out flat with no structure and off-color with too much silver or black. Could this be a grounding issue? J.C., Terrell, Tex.
It could be a grounding problem. It depends on what kind of metal flake is used in the powder coating to get the silver appearance though. I thought most powder manufacturers were using nonmetallic material because electrostatic application can cause inconsistencies in the metal flakes. In liquid coating, the metal flakes lie flat. In powder, metal flakes have a tendency to stand on edge, which gives an entirely different and unwanted appearance. The appearance difference can also be caused by reclaim issues, such as too much reclaim or too fine reclaim. In some situations, you can’t even use reclaimed metal-flake powders because of the changes in appearance. A slim possibility exists that you have a surface issue with your substrate, but I think that’s really stretching things. Anyway, it never hurts to verify grounding conditions in a powder system, so I would go straight there. —G.T.
Q: My company is struggling with finish issues. We asked our powder supplier about these problems, and they said it all depends on the particle size of our virgin and reclaim materials. What should the particle size be for a gloss, satin, and matte finish? Our typical coating thickness is 60 microns. Thanks for your help. S.U., Chennai, India
Particle size can affect surface smoothness in cured powder coatings. However, the particle size is determined by the powder coating formulator when they grind and scalp the material prior to shipping it out. You can only change the particle size by not properly mixing reclaim and virgin powder during normal operation.
Powder reclaim systems can change the particle size over time, as larger particles are easier to charge and end up on the part and finer particles end up in the reclaim. Cyclone systems can also scalp the fines making the average particle size shift over time. For both these reasons, your powder coating supplier recommends that you mix 30 percent reclaim powder with 70 percent virgin material before reusing it to ensure the particle size is always the same. However, if your first-pass transfer efficiency is not 70 percent, you will be collecting more reclaim than you can use at this ideal mix ratio. Therefore, most people use a 50/50 mixture of virgin and reclaim without problems. —N.L.
Q: Our cure oven is a direct-fired convection system on the roof of our plant, and parts are carried through on a chain-driven conveyor. The oven shape is rectangular, measuring 22 feet by 55 feet (~1,100 square feet). The exhaust is currently located only about 5 feet away from the heat exchanger. My question is this: Would it be more efficient, and would we get a more even heat spread, if the exhaust was at the other end of the oven? F.S., Joplin, Mo.
The exhaust should be dampened to the point that it has little affect on the efficiency of the oven. To prove or disprove this, you should run an oven temperature recorder to see if the graph, or chart, shows a spike in the area of the exhaust. You’ll have to play around a bit with an air probe, but you should be able to tell if you’re really pulling too much heat to the exhaust.
I seriously doubt that you would recover the expense of relocating the exhaust in heat savings. If you’re having oven issues, the first thing to do is run a recorder and inspect the air and metal temperature curves to see if you have hot spots or cold spots. Without this information, you’re shooting in the dark. —G.T.
Q: We apply white, high-gloss, smooth hybrid powder coating onto galvanized panels that are used for spray booths. Some locales require that the panels be grounded. The powder acts as an insulator. Masking specific areas to allow panels to have contact is problematic for the spraying and installation process. We plan to use a light gray powder to differentiate the panels that should be conductive. I would like to know more about using conductive powders, such as sources, issues with coating and curing, and durability. T.B., Greensboro, N.C.
The conductive powders that are on the market may not meet the code requirements you’re trying to satisfy. These materials usually are formulated with some metallic components to improve grounding conductivity. However, the metallics used in these formulas are sometimes heavy metals (like zinc) that will require special disposal of the waste material.
I can understand that masking can cause problems, as aligning these areas during installation may be problematic. However, the easiest solution is to provide a self-tapping screw and hole at the panel joints. The installer will only have to insert this self-drilling/self-tapping screw to electrically connect adjoining panels and have perfect conductivity for grounding purposes. I’ve also seen some suppliers use jumper wires with these type of fasteners, but they’re unnecessary if your screw cuts through any paint in the pilot hole and is tightly inserted.
This is the best, simplest, and cheapest solution to your problem. Conductive powders will be a much more costly solution. —N.L.
Q: My question concerns the pros and cons of using aluminum bars, racks, and hooks for hanging parts. Any problems with ground? What about over a sustained period of time? J.E., Grandview, Mo.
Aluminum is a decent conductor, so it serves well as part of the ground path. However, after repeated passes in an oven, it will soften some, and depending upon the weight of the parts you’re hanging, it could begin to lose its shape, which would lead to parts falling off in the oven.
I don’t recall ever going into a shop and finding aluminum being used as an S hook or a load bar or a rack. It’s just too risky for the many passes through hot and cold cycles in a powder coating system.
To compound the problem, rack and hook cleaning is an issue. A burn-off system will damage the hook, leaving it soft. That means the cleaning method would have to be a chemical process. Actually, I’ve never known of anyone using this method of hook cleaning because, as I mentioned, I’ve never observed anyone using aluminum for hangers.
Cost may be a factor, at least around my area, because aluminum is more expensive than cold rolled or hot rolled steel, and the life cycle is shorter for aluminum than for steel. —G.T.
Q: We’ve found a cobweb-like appearance on the surface of parts before and after they are cured. We apply white, glossy hybrid powder coatings on perfectly pretreated mild steel components that are hung on the conveyor for some time (15-20 minutes) before they enter the oven. Could you please tell me the cause of this problem? Gloss and other properties of the coating aren’t disturbed with this cobweb appearance. S.K., St. Louis, Mo.
There are only a few of things that can cause a cobweb. First is a spider, but I don’t expect that you would ask me a coating question if you have an insect-infestation problem. Second is fibrous airborne contaminants that are attracted to the charged powder on the part surface. These can appear as strands of lint hanging from your part. Eliminating or controlling the source of these contaminants will eliminate this as an issue.
Finally, cobwebs can be caused when coating warm parts (above 250°F) in the powder booth. The heat near the part causes the powder to begin to melt as it’s atomized by the gun, causing cobwebs. These are normally seen in the booth and on the guns but can also end up on the parts as they exit the booth. Reducing the part temperature during coating operations will eliminate these cobwebs. Check you dry-off oven temperature or install cooling fans to cool the parts before they enter the powder booth, and this will go away. —N.L.
Q: Can I apply a water-based paint after powder coating has been allowed to dry without scuffing the surface of the part? What prep work is involved with a powder-coated product that I would like to paint? S.L., Olympia, Wash.
To a great deal, it depends on the gloss of the powder coating. If the powder is high gloss, the slippery surface won’t make for good adhesion. In that case, you would need to scuff the surface. I strongly suggest that you try a sample piece. Coat it exactly as you want the real part coated, and check the appearance and adhesion. There can be problems between the two different coatings that would give an unsatisfactory finish. In other words, the two coatings must be compatible to give the results you want. It may not be any problem. I know it’s done, but it would be wise to make a test sample. —G.T.
Q: I passed a sample of high-gloss, white, hybrid powder coating through an infrared (IR) oven for 1 minute and a gas oven at 180°C (356°F) for 20 minutes, and the color turned yellow. When I passed the same sample through the gas oven without the IR oven, it didn’t change color. What in the formulation do I have to add to avoid this yellowish problem? S.C., Laval, Que.
The yellowing problem is most often caused by overcure of the powder coating. When powder coatings are overcured, the first properties affected are the color and gloss. Whites often turn yellow in this situation. If you continue to over-cure the coating, the powder will become brittle and eventually burn into ash. IR ovens can impart a tremendous amount of energy onto a part surface, creating great surface temperature. Excessive heat for prolonged periods will cause the powder coating to be over-cured. Because over-cured powders typically discolor, your particular white powder turned yellow. Reduce the IR heat by reducing the IR emitter output and/or reduce the time in the IR section of your oven to eliminate the problem. This is proved by the fact that you say your powder is unaffected when you use the convection oven all by itself. maybe you should eliminate the IR when running this part or color. As for additives, if you’re the powder coating end-user, you can’t add anything to the powder formulation to correct this problem; you can only change you process. If you’re the powder formulator, be sure you’re using temperature-tolerant pigments in your formulation, and slow down the reaction of the powder resin with reduced catalyst or a different catalyst. That solution is powder formulation 101 stuff, so maybe you should revisit some of the basics. —N.L.
Q: Is there a formula that can be used to determine the cost of an empty hook that goes through a coating system? D.S., Muscatine, Iowa
I am unaware of any formula for the cost of an empty hook. That is likely because the coating operation is so specialized in each shop. Costs for labor, utilities, materials, and other factors come into play when coating a given product. And of course, hooks vary according to the company you bought them from. If you know, and you should, what it costs to coat a particular part, an empty hook on the hanger for those parts will have a negative cost. Many stories are floating around about the cost associated with downtime in an automotive plant. There is a plant near my residence, and the reported cost for line downtime is $22,000 each minute. Seems astronomical doesn’t it? When you figure labor rates, facility costs, and the number of uncompleted vehicles coming off the line, that number doesn’t sound too far off. I have no idea how accurate those figures are, but the point is this: Lost production is very costly. —G.T.
Q: Hello, I would like to know if the powder coating process induces a magnetic field in ferrous sheets and tubes. Could you provide any specific detail if so. Thanks, J.B., Austin, Tex.
No. Magnetism isn’t part of the powder coating process. If your metal has magnetic properties, it got it from somewhere else; not the powder coating system. —N.L.
Q: I’m having cast aluminum parts powder coated in China with a medium texture flat black powder. When I receive the parts, the powder coating can be scraped off, and it’s being chipped during shipment. What’s the cause of this? The coating should be more durable than this, right? Another question: Is there a flat white powder available to withstand 572°F (300°C) to 662°F (350°C)? J.E., Little Neck, N.Y.
My, my, when will industry in this country learn to keep products here, in part for good quality control? How the heck are you going to make sure you have properly coated parts thousands of miles away? OK, so much for the sermon. The issue is the proper treatment of the aluminum before powder coating. If you did not specify all of the coating conditions, then you’re getting what you asked for. If you did, someone gets a trip to China! Aluminum must be cleaned and etched to remove the self-protective coating (patina) that in hibits the adhesion of the powder coating. If the coater is cleaning with an iron phosphate with no fluoride additive or conversion coat, then the coater isn’t removing this protective coat. As a result, the aluminum will shed the powder coating. And be aware that cleaning the parts and then letting them sit around for days will only allow the aluminum to try to protect itself again—thus a second cleaning. A crosshatch test would be most helpful with samples run and sent to you with each batch of parts coated. Make them do this ALWAYS. —G.T.
Q: Do you have a suggestion for powder coating the inside of pipe that is of various diameters and lengths? A customer wants to use a wet primer and then powder. What type of equipment is needed? R.C., Shoshoni, Wy.
Interior pipe coatings has been applied with powder coating equipment going back to the late 1970s. The minimum inside pipe diameter is 6 inches. Lengths in excess of 20 feet have been routinely powder-coated. Specialized equipment is necessary to perform this work, specifically pipe coating systems. These systems use collectors at each end of the pipe, and the gun(s) are fed through the pipe on a lance. A wheel is lo – cated at the bottom of the lance to support the lance and gun weight when inside the pipe. With the powder turned off, the gun is inserted into the pipe at a speed of up to 100 feet per minute. The gun is then actuated on and coats the pipe on the way out as the gun is extracted at a much slower speed. The collectors at each end of the pipe collect the overspray (the actual booth cabin is the pipe itself). Often several pipes are coated in parallel with multiple gun and lance systems. During the late 1970s and early 1980s, many of these systems were sold to pipe manufacturers supplying the drilling industry, although they are currently not as popular. You can purchase this type of specialized equipment from any of the mainstream powder coating equipment suppliers, if they still make them. —N.L.
Q: I’m looking for a powder coatings manufacturer who has a highly fuel resistant powder. Do you know of any company? B.H., Spring Lake, Mich.
There are only so many resin and additive combinations available to the formulator, so most powder producers will have something in their bag that should work. Epoxies have excellent chemical resistance, and a hybrid material will give you good chemical resistance and yet have ultraviolet-light resistance. I don’t know what your application is, but most fuels evaporate long before they do any damage to the coating. Vehicles are powder-coated with polyesters and acrylics with no effects at the fuel filler area. Now, if you want to immerse the fuel in a powder-coated vessel, that’s another matter. Then you need to test a good grade of epoxy. —G.T.
Q: We are into sheet metal fabrication with powder coating. For some days now, we have been facing pinhole problems in our powder coating. The diameter of the pinhole that appears on the powder-coated components starts from 0.2 micrometer in diameter to 1.0 micrometer in diameter. We have a nine-tank pretreatment process (hot process) before going to powder coating. To remove the moisture in the air, we have provided a dryer, a moisture separator, an oil separator, and an automatic drain valve. We are not able to eliminate the problem. We are looking forward to your suggestions. J.C., Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
Pinholes in powder coatings are created when a gas escapes through the coating when the coating surface hardens, leaving a hole. Earlier in the cure cycle when the coating is still in its liquid state, the coating will reflow over the affected area, and there is no visible problem. Now all you have to do is figure out what is causing the release of the gas that is piercing the coating. If your substrate material is a casting, it’s likely that the gas is entrapped within the metal and escapes under heat. In this case, preheating the casting can help to drive the gas out of the metal before you coat it. If your substrate is a weldment and the pinhole is in the weld area, porosity can be your problem. In this case, the weld has holes that can trap moisture or contaminants that vaporize in the cure oven. The resultant gas causes the pinhole. Poorly cleaned or pretreated surfaces can cause pin holes because contaminants left on the surface under the coating will vaporize and pierce the coating surface. Sometimes contaminants can be introduced after the cleaning/ pretreatment process. Mishandling the parts, airborne contaminants in the plant environment, oil or moisture in the compressed air, and so on are all likely sources of these post-pretreatment contaminants. The worst airborne contaminant is silicone, but this usually causes a defect called a fisheye, not a pinhole. From your question, it looks as if you have enough cleaning stages, a compressed air separator, and your substrate is sheet metal. Therefore, you can eliminate outgassing from castings. However, all the other scenarios are still in play because your nine-stage cleaning/pretreatment system or compressed air separator may not be functioning properly or providing a water-break-free surface on the substrate. Don’t forget the airborne contaminants in your search to isolate this problem. —N.L.
Q: Our two powder coating processes are batch done in a nonreclaim booth and an automated booth. The automated line usually runs at about 7 feet per minute with the rack hooks spaced out at 2 feet. We were considering automating the batch booth process by using operators to spray the parts going past. What line speed would you recommend for this? On average, it will take our skilled operator 51 seconds to coat 12 of our hardest parts on a rack. K.K., Jamestown, N.Y.
Usually, and I underscore usually, the volume of product off of the line dictates the line speed. With existing equipment, the oven or the washer times will be the determining factors, not what a person can spray. Having said that, you can get ridiculous and set a line speed too fast for one operator to be able to properly coat the parts going past. In that case, you add another operator. Part design and coating requirements enter into the formula as well. Anyway, don’t start with what the coater can do. I need to know a lot more about the system and the parts you are coating to arrive at any line speed. —G.T.
Q: My question is about color changes. We apply white triglycidyl isocyanurate (TGIC) and low-gloss black powders in the same booth. We reclaim. After changing from white to black, we see cross contamination as little white specs in the black. When we change from black to white, we see no contamination. We clean the booth the same for both white and black. We take about 1.5 to 2 hours per changeover. This is done three times in 24 hours. The only thing that we reuse is the booth and the cyclone. These are completely cleaned out by washing and wiping them down. The powder hoses and the reclaim hoppers are only used for their designated color. Is there any more that we could do to stop the white in the black? J.M., Adrian, Mich.
Is the white a low gloss or a high gloss? Offhand, I’m not sure what the gloss has to do with it, but the white, if it’s a higher gloss, may be at least part of the problem. However, this says that there is certainly some very minor detail that’s different in the cleaning process. There may be some eddy currents in the airflow that are trapping some powder, but I don’t know why it would trap one color versus another. I would have to have more details on the cleaning process and the equipment powder path to be of any assistance. —G.T.
Q: Is there any such thing as a no-bake powder coating? If so, do you have any details on it? Thank you for your response. B.S., Taylor, Mich.
All powder coatings require heat to melt and flow to form the coating on the part surface. Some specialty powder coatings can be melted and cured at very low temperatures (around 250°F). Others, referred to as ultraviolet-curable (UV-curable) powders, are melted with heat at 250°F and then cured by using a UV light source. Finally, there are powder coatings that can be applied by using a flame-spray gun that ignites liquid propane (LP) gas at the gun tip, which melts the powder as it’s applied to the intended surface. All these methods involve heat to some degree, but offer alternatives to baking the powder coating onto the part. —N.L.
Q: If you had to decide between liquid or powder painting, what would be your decision and why? R.S., Distrito Federal, Mexico
It depends on what you want the coating to do and what your existing painting capabilities are. From a pure coatings standpoint, powder will be a better coating. However, other factors influence the choice, some that you can accommodate and some that you can’t or won’t.
There are several books written on the subject. Check the online Article Index sections on this website. The Powder Coating Institute also offers a text on the subject, visit www.powdercoating.org to search for it. You didn’t give any other details, so I can’t get too far with helping you. To repeat, when it comes to the coating, powder would be my choice over liquid. —G.T.
Q: How can we control powder consumption? Do you have any tips or methods we can use? S.B., Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
This question begs a dissertation! So many factors are involved, and I don’t have much information to go on, so I can only respond in general terms.
Powder consumption can be high because of too much film build on the parts you’re coating. Consumption can be high because of poor hanger design. It can be high because the parts have been designed for something other than a spray application. If you have the correct booth, with a reclaim system, you should be recovering the overspray and blending it with virgin material. If you have too much overspray, eventually the reclaim will be mostly fine particles, and you’ll have problems with fluidization, application, and so on.
Here are some things to check: Is the airflow in the booth such that it contains powder, or does powder escape out of the openings? Is the hanger design so poor that the part surface isn’t presented properly to the spray gun? Poor hanger design will cause too much overspray, and you’ll likely have too much coating on the hanger. Make a list of all the things to look for, and then check them out and systematically mark them off of the list until you find the problem. Then fix it. —G.T.
Q: I was recently asked how to apply two-tone powder coating to a wheel. Could you please inform me on how to address this issue. I’m kind of baffled. Will the spokes need to be removed? I’ll wait to hear back from you. Have a blessed day! L.J., Spring, Tex.
Thanks for the blessing. I can always use an extra one now and then. You have two choices when powder coating a spoked motorcycle wheel in two colors. First, you can disassemble the wheel, coat the parts separately, and reassemble it afterwards (as you state in your question). This is the most bulletproof way of obtaining what you want, at a higher labor cost for the disassembly and re assembly of the wheel. The second choice is to mask the wheel and coat it assembled. This would require you to apply the first coat and only partially cure it for handling. Then you would remove the masking and remask the wheel covering that you just coated, exposing the new area. Now you will fully cure the wheel to ensure full coating properties. Be aware that the masking line where the two coats meet will be very sharp, requiring some final work (wet sanding and polishing) to blend the two areas. Good luck. —N.L.
Q: I have coated several items with high-gloss clear. The clear looked great for the first couple of weeks. Now the clear is cracking in spots. I have coated two items with the same clear within 24 hours, and both items have cracked in spots. What am I doing wrong? Hope you can help with my problem. C.L., Birmingham, Ala.
Is the clear coating material coordinated with the basecoat below it? You can’t just arbitrarily apply a clear over any old basecoat. The two need to be compatible. Check with the people who supplied the powder to you. —G.T.
Q: We have powder coating booths, and I was wondering what the regulations are to clean powder from employees in Michigan. Can you use air to blow off powder? N.H., Grand Rapids, Mich.
I have no idea what the rules are in Michigan. However, the Federal OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) specifies that compressed air must be regulated, dispersed using safety nozzles, or both to ensure that full line pressure cannot be used to clean operators. However, even with these precautions, there will be sufficient air pressure to remove most powder from an operator’s clothing.
For the long-term wellbeing of your operators, you should look into using Tyvek suits (overalls) that are cheap and disposable. This will help you in two ways: It’ll keep your operators’ clothing clean, and it’ll eliminate contaminants from their clothing (lint, dirt, etc.), which can adversely affect your process. —N.L.
Q: I build large aluminum globes of the world and I have a 5-foot-diameter globe that we need to first powder coat with clear and then have the outsides of the continents painted to resemble the ‘Blue Marble’ NASA image from space. My questions would be: Beyond scuffing, what other prep do I need to do? Is there a powder type/primer chemistry that works well together? Do I need a primer? My artist will be mixing paints on a palette for the topcoat, so she can’t use high VOC or two-part paints. M.B., Chicago, Ill.
I have to say that this is one of the more unusual questions I received lately. Having said that, I think I can help you. If these globes are used indoors, a primer is unnecessary for good product life. A standard polyester powder coating formula will provide great service life during the use of the product.
Scuffing the surface to ensure good intercoat adhesion is important before you do the artistry. For extra measure, a clear topcoat using normal liquid technologies will encapsulate and protect the artwork. —N.L.
Q: I am very accustomed to working with robotic spray and dispense applications in manufacturing. However, with powder coating applications, I have only seen manual and vertical reciprocator methods used. Does anyone use robots with powder coating applications, and what are the pros and cons of using a robot? S.J., Des Plaines, Ill.
Powder application has been done with painting robots for many years. In the early ’80s, I installed a robot with a standard powder gun to coat the inside of a box. It worked very well. The company did that for quite a few years before the product line was moved elsewhere. Several of my employer’s competitors were doing the same thing. The automotive industry is doing this with a two-headed application gun for certain areas on new car bodies. Several companies have used powder bells mounted on a robot to coat their products. So, there are powder applications with robots. Probably the biggest problem with robotic applications is protecting the working parts or the robotic arm so that the powder doesn’t get into some very intricate moving section, such as the robotic wrist. The service life of a robotic wrist will be very short if exposed to the powder. The robotics companies make covers for the delicate parts of their products. The big benefit with using robots is that they can coat areas that a person would complain about, and the robots don’t have to take breaks.
This isn’t meant to be a criticism of manual spraying, but product designers don’t always consider what has to be done to get a part coated. When you require a person to put on a complete suit, with mask and gloves, and tape the sleeves, and then the overspray completely covers the person in a matter of minutes, you’re asking a bit much. Try doing that 8 hours a day, 5 days a week. This is the kind of job you give to a robot. I won’t even get into consistency of finish and operator fatigue! —G.T.
Q: One of my customers asked if he could overcoat fusion-bonded epoxy. The material is applied electrostatically in a spray booth. We apply the epoxy to AWWA (American Water Works Association) C213 standards. We manufacture carbon and stainless steel pipe couplings for the water and wastewater industry. They are from a little less than 3 inches to 240 inches in diameter. T.P., Doraville, Ga.
By overcoat do you mean recoat? You should be able to do this, but be aware of any tight tolerances and the possibility that the heavy coating might cause some fit problems. You’ll want to check for inner-coat adhesion on a regular basis, and you’ll want to be sure that the parts are clean before doing any overcoating. A good wash job will do; pretreatment chemicals are unnecessary. How is the adhesion on the stainless? —G.T.
Q: What type of powder coating is best for exterior railing or ornamental iron work? A.L., Redwood City, Calif.
When I specified my railing coating requirements, I selected the following: Blasted steel, iron phosphate pretreatment, zinc rich epoxy primer, and TGIC-based polyester topcoat. This painting specification is easy for most powder coaters to meet. The only improvement I would have made was to add galvanizing before iron phosphate, but most local coaters can’t do this. I hope to never paint my railing again in my lifetime. —N.L.
Q: Is there a process for removing the powder from silicone plugs and caps? We’re getting a buildup, which is causing a bridging effect when we reuse the plugs too many times. We roll the plugs in our hands and try to crack the powder so it falls off, which works to a point but is a tedious process. Any suggestions would really help. D.A., Ivyland, Pa.
There seems to be some deep dark secrets about how to clean and reuse silicone masking devices. There are companies that will do it for you, at a cost of course. And I know of companies that soak the plugs in a mild solvent overnight and then blow them off the next morning. I know that when you talk with a company that has a method, they guard the method as if it were gold. And one of the last people they would tell is a columnist! Anyway, give the solvent method a try if you haven’t already. Start with a very mild solvent and work your way up the chain, keeping all safety precautions in mind. —G.T.
Q: What causes starbursts in wrinkle powders? D.R., Asheboro, N.C.
Starbursts, or at least the common use of the term, means kilovolt (kV) rejection. This is caused by the gun being too close to the part or having the kV setting too high for what you’re spraying. Starbursts may also be caused by the use of magnetic hang points, but so few people use magnetic hang methods that this would be a very rare. If these situations don’t apply, the problem is in the powder; but I really have my doubts about that. You’d have to have an epidemic of starbursts all over every part. The solution for that is to change powders. If nothing I’ve discussed fits your problem, then you’ll need to give me a better description of what your “starbursts” look like. —G.T.
Q: I have some powder left from three years ago. As long as it sprays, will there be any curing problems? M.H., Leola, Pa.
Toss this old powder. You definitely don’t want to use it. Who knows what you might end up with! —N.L.
Q: I have an issue with bleed-through when using an industrial paint pen. It’s a yellow opaque ink. The application is to mark product by customer order and lay out hole locations on roll-formed and structural angle. The bleed-through happens on our light colors. Is there a product that will survive the outside elements and multiple handling but will wash off in our processor’s rinse tanks, which are industry-standard processes. Thank you in advance for any possible solutions or products to test. D.C., Dalton, Ohio
I don’t know of a marker that will remain on the painted surface, withstand some abuse, and be removable in the rinse tanks. I would suggest using very thin colored plastic “dots” or some similar marker that stays on a product pretty well but also can be removed. Some of these markers are used as masks and can withstand cure temperatures without leaving any residue or defects. Masking companies are listed under Masking Products in the magazine’s Online Buyers Guide. —G.T.
Q: Could you provide information on primers and abrasion techniques that could be used to improve adhesion of powder coating to electroless-nickel (e-nickel)? Our customer wants painted e-nickel because of the electromagnetic interference (EMI) characteristics of the e-nickel coating. The customer wants powder coating because of the added aesthetic value. Any information you could provide would be helpful in solving some of our current problems with coating e-nickel. E.H., Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Whatever you do will add some expense to the process. The easiest way to improve adhesion would be to lightly abrade the nickel. This would have to be tested to assure that you haven’t negatively affected the nickel. You could apply a primer, but this doubles the process as you well know. I would hold that idea in reserve in case the abrasive method doesn’t work. After all, you only need to present a slightly rough surface to the paint for it to adhere to the substrate, so don’t get carried away. As you probably guessed, a primer will adhere somewhat to the nickel but may not be to spec, so I suspect that the abrasion method is your best bet. Try an abrasive pad first. They come in various grit sizes, and you can get most of them for manual use or affixed to a sander. —G.T.
Q: Is e-coating (electro-deposition coating) similar to powder coating? If different, what’s different about the applications? Is there anything different between the two applications with the Faraday cage? R.L., Oriskany, N.Y.
The only similarities between e-coating and powder coating is the word coating. I assume you know what powder coating is, and I won’t bore our readers with information they already know about the finishing process that’s the very name of this magazine.
E-coating is an immersion finishing process in which parts are dipped into a tank of paint (often epoxy), and an electrical charge is sent through the paint to attract the paint to the part. The part may have a negative or positive polarity, depending on if the e-coat tank is anodic or cathodic. The coatings are limited in formulation and color for this process, unlike powder coatings, which come in numerous formulas and colors for just about any application.
E-coat is applied in very thin films (often around 0.2 mil). It can be used as an inexpensive topcoat but is most often used as a primer. There are no Faraday cage issues with e-coat, but there are limitations to where the coating can be deposited. These areas are defined as low current density areas and areas where “throw power” limits coverage. This limitation is significantly less of an issue in e-coating than the Faraday coverage issue in powder coatings.
Finally, e-coating can be applied very inexpensively. If the average applied material cost for powder coating is $0.15 per square foot, the average applied material cost for e-coat is $0.02 per square foot. —N.L.
Q: Can powder coating replace nickel plating? We already have the equipment to apply powder coating. We’re having problems with corrosion (rust) in nickel-plated parts (housing bearings) during overseas shipments to a customer. That’s why we think we can replace the nickel plating with powder coating. The parts are sent to a vendor to be nickel-plated, but we’re having problems with the coating. The vendor is probably not doing it right, so we thought we could use powder coating to protect the parts better. The housings are made of carbon steel. C.B., El Salto, Jalisco, Mexico
Well, you can, but it would depend on what the coating is supposed to do. I would need to know what the coating performance specifications are to pass any type of judgment. Powder would certainly be a cheaper coating, and in this country nickel presents environmental problems. Nickel is certainly a hard surface coating, and tends to be a heavier coating than powder coating, so part tolerances would be an issue as well. I certainly wouldn’t make a change until I understood the coating performance specifications. By the way, there are ways to protect metal parts that are shipped via boats to prevent oxidation. But based on the information you’ve told me, powder would do nicely if the film build doesn’t create any problems. I suspect that the film thickness will have to be 2.0 to 2.5 mils. If that works for you, then go for it. —G.T.
Q: We currently powder coat our aluminum brake calipers red and black. They frequently see temperatures around 300°F and are subjected to hot DOT 3 brake fluid. We’re using bright red polyurethane and black polyester TGIC. We apply the colors separately and cure them at 400°F for 40 minutes. After they’ve been cured, we do a hot pot test where we submerge the caliper in hot DOT 3 brake fluid at 250°F for 2 hours, remove, and let cool, wiping off excess brake fluid. We then bake at 375°F for 20 minutes. After that time, the red is still rock hard, and the black is soft and tacky. What would cause that? C.S., Camarillo, Calif.
There is some speculation on my part, but I would think that calipers of aluminum would reach cure temperature in less than 15 minutes. I don’t know how much less, but less. That would mean for instance that the powder cure is ±30 minutes at 400°F. You should check your powder cure schedule. I think you’re over-baking, and that may be the problem with the black. You need to get your hands on a temperature recorder for the oven, and rather quickly. Your powder supplier should have one that you can use for a brief time to develop a cure chart. Without one, you’re groping in the dark. You’ll need it for about a day. Run more than one test. These instruments fit into a heat-resistant thermal box. Depending on the type of unit, it may have from three to six or more probes. The probes measure metal temperature on several locations on the part, usually a high point and a low point, and if so equipped, a mid-point. Another probe measures oven air. These instruments are critical in detailing information about what’s going on in an oven. You may have hot or cold spots due to improper adjustment of the dampers. The thermocouples may be bad or failing and giving false information. You get the point. Typically, the instrument is encased inside a thermal protective unit and has a graph ribbon on which the various probes will make their color-coded lines. The probes are usually numbered so that you can tell which line is air temperature and which lines are metal temperature. In theory, you should have a nice ramp-up set of lines for metal temperature. The air reading will go up much quicker, and the lines should be fairly straight to the exit point. If your production levels are at least moderate, and you’re planning to grow your business, then you should consider purchasing a temperature recorder for your oven. Frankly, I don’t know how you could operate without one. —G.T.
Q: We’re somewhat new to powder. We’re having issues with clumping due to humidity here in Indiana. We don’t always have our materials stored in our air-conditioned areas, and in some cases, we have $10-per-pound material that is used infrequently clumping between days it’s used. We’re looking for ways to rescue clumped material and any other ideas to use, such as desiccants, when the powder isn’t in the air-conditioned storage. C.J., Markle, Ind.
For some things, there are no substitutes. However, if you have agglomerated material, you can run it through a sieve, be it handheld or powered, and remove a great deal of the lumps, but not all. In the long run, the cheapest way to avoid agglomerated powder (due to moisture) is to place the material is an environmentally controlled atmosphere. Maybe that’s the bosses’ office, or whatever. You’re going to spend a lot of time (and money) trying to eliminate it from the system. For the boxed powder, you should get some air conditioning. Desiccant absorbers don’t work very well in this situation. That’s because the preferred storage and usage humidity is in the 20 to 60 percent range, and desiccant canisters or bags aren’t that sophisticated. The most common way to condition the powder that’s in the hoppers is to leave the fluidization air on all the time, including weekends and overnight. This is predicated on your having good, dry compressed air. If the compressed air is damp, don’t bother because it’ll make the situation worse. Hey, suck it up, take the bosses’ credit card and go to Wal-Mart or H.H. Gregg to buy a room air conditioner and put it in the storage room. And make sure you size the AC for the room. —G.T.
Q: We’ve just started a powder coating operation. We had mostly sprayed powder on structured components. Recently, a customer required a plain polyester powder coating in star white. With this type of powder, however, we had pinholes on the surface. We tried some tactics to solve the problem. For example, we checked the dryer for the powder coating plant, and it works fine. We checked the spray application equipment, and cleaned the booth and the area thoroughly. We’re still getting pinholes. Please help us. P.B., Navi Mumbai, Mahape, India
You left out some information. What is the substrate? Is it a material that might be out-gassing? Or is the cleaning method leaving something on the surface that causes pinholes? And how old and under what conditions is the powder stored? It might be old or gone bad. This isn’t likely, but it’s something that should be eliminated from your search for an answer. I don’t know with any certainty what you mean by “structured” components. All things being proper, you shouldn’t have any problems applying polyester. Maybe you have an equipment contamination problem that just doesn’t show up to the naked eye when you examine the parts that are “structured.” —G.T.
Q: I need to coat copper tubing (refrigeration) for immersion in water (tube and drum water chiller). The coating needs to be durable, yet able to flex with the copper tubing. Any ideas? Thank you. B.A., Wrangell, Ark.
Years ago I coated some copper tube for use in a refrigeration unit. I used an epoxy material for that situation, partly because the epoxy was what I had on hand and partly because the epoxy was flexible enough to move with the tubing, yet retain its adhesion, and it was never going to see sunlight, so UV wasn’t an issue. Just in case bad things started to grow in the water, the epoxy was pretty resistant to whatever might take life. Okay, so now you’ve heard a tale from the past. It would still apply though: An epoxy material will hold up while immersed in water, and you won’t need any UV resistance either. Bear in mind that the copper must be very clean for good adhesion. —G.T.
Q: I apply a super-durable TGIC-based (triglycidyl isocyanurate) polyester powder on extruded aluminum parts. Currently, I claim that the coating meets American Architectural Manufacturers Association (AAMA) standard specification 2604-02. This states that a panel exposed to South Florida weathering will retain a minimum gloss of 30 percent and change a maximum of 5 delta E units over a 5-year period. Recently, I began using a new powder supplier, and I can’t wait 5 years for test results. I would like to develop a specification that uses accelerated weathering as the test method, but I’m not sure what performance objectives to claim or which accelerated test to use. Are standard specs already written for this type of weathering? If not, are there performance benchmarks I could use as a starting point (perhaps in the automotive industry)? A.G., Philadelphia, Pa.
Several papers have been written in regards to Florida weathering studies on super-durable TGIC-based polyesters. One of these papers compares and correlates between Florida weathering data and artificial weathering with equipment such as QUV A-340 and Weather-O-Meter. There are claims that a given number of QUV A-340 exposure hours are equivalent to 1 year of Florida weathering. It’s possible that 1,000 hours of Weather-O-Meter exposure with the 102/18 program, which is 102 minutes of ultraviolet (UV) light and 18 minutes of deionized (DI) water sprinkling, is equivalent to 1 year of Florida exposure. So, you could look at somewhere around 200 days of artificial weathering test duration, which is about 7 months. This is a long time to wait on results. You should compare the high outdoor durability of the powder from the previous supplier side by side with the powder from the new supplier. We discourage the use of the faster and higher intensity artificial weathering test procedure (QUV B-313 ). It has been proved that these tests don’t correlate well with actual outdoor weathering. The automotive industry is replacing these tests with artificial weathering testing as mentioned above. Ask the new supplier to guarantee the powder against the AAMA 2604-02 weathering specification. If the supplier doesn’t want to do that, then you better go back to what has been proved to work. You know the old story: You get what you pay for! —G.T.
Q: I have some automotive car parts (sheet metal fog lights) in need of powder coating. I’ve bead-blasted the housings, smoothed the surfaces with 380-grit sanding disks, and blended and smoothed with a Scotch-Brite abrasive wheel. Is it possible to fill the remaining rust pits with a metal-filled epoxy? How will the electrostatic attraction be affected, or do you have suggestions? B.P., Tampa, Fla.
The metal-filled epoxy should attract the powder. However, in a finite diagnosis, if the metal fillers don’t touch one another and they don’t ever touch the base metal, it’s conceivable that the coating would be light. You could consider pre-heating the part to about 110°F; however, it will cause some heavier film build on the remainder of the part. Actually, I think you won’t have any problems with what you’re doing. The filler will be pretty thin, so coverage should be uniform. —G.T.
Q: We’re currently using epoxy powder coating and testing for sufficient cure by using methyl ethyl ketone (MEK). We have an initiative to get MEK out of the facility for environmental health and safety reasons. We have received recommendations of toluene and xylene, which aren’t acceptable either. Do you know of any chemical that will be aggressive enough to verify cure without being a total toxic organic or a carcinogen? C.B., Reading, Pa.
Plain and simple: No, there’s no substitute for a reasonably quick check on cure. If you follow the Powder Coating Institute’s “#8 Recommended Procedure for Solvent Cure Test,” you’ll use very little MEK, and it can be stored safely in a quart can in a safety cabinet. Several other tests are available, although each has its drawback. • The glacial acetic acid test uses 96 percent, or higher, concentrated acetic acid. It’s applied in one drop on the film surface. After 60 seconds, the surface is wiped off, and the film is judged for loss of gloss, softening, discoloration, and so forth. It’s very similar to the standard MEK test, but glacial acetic acid is very corrosive, and it can cause exposed skin to blister after a short exposure. It seems to be worse than the MEK test. • Another test that is destructive and not very accurate is the scrape test. In this case, you would cut into the paint film down to the substrate and then drag the blade along the film for about an inch. Undercured films will break away easily from the substrate. It takes an experienced person to establish a value to this test, and even then, it’s a bit subjective. • The most accurate test, one which will hold up in a court of law should it ever come to that, is a differential scanning calorimetry test. In this case, 5 to 10 milligrams of scrapings are removed from the film and tested against a known uncured sample of the same powder material. The results will actually give you the percent of cure by comparing the exothermic reaction of the undercured material with the suspected film. The standard coating performance tests for hardness, impact resistance, color fading, and so on will also give you a clue as to whether the coating is cured. Of course, all of this takes time. If I were you, I’d give all of this information to the department that has insisted on the removal of a very, very small quantity of MEK, and tell them that they can bear the burden of the budget that will give you an alternate method of testing parts for cure. —G.T.
Q: We’re looking for a powder that meets Mil d 24712. Do you know any suppliers who do the testing on their powder to meet this specification? M.B., Holliston, Mass.
I think the spec you’re referring to is Mil-C-24712, not Mil d 24712. This is the generic powder coating specification developed by the US government to describe most all common powder coatings. Most powder coatings should meet this spec, but most powder coating suppliers don’t bother trying to “qualify” their material to this spec. It covers the following generic powder formulations: epoxy, epoxy-polyester hybrid, polyester, triglycidyl isocyanurate (TGIC) polyester, polyester urethane hybrid, acrylic, acrylic-polyester hybrid, acrylic urethane hybrid, urethane, polyurethane, vinyl, and nylon. That about covers the entire gamut of materials in our industry other than polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) and Teflon.
Go to this publication’s Web site www.pcoating.com and click on Online Buyers Guide at the left. Search under Powder Coatings for military spec powder coatings to contact a supplier that probably has materials to meet this very generous spec. —N.L.
Q: I’ve been having some trouble with clear powder coating over a veined powder coating. After the part leaves the shop, customers complain about the clear cracking or spider-webbing. I’ve talked with the powder supplier, and I was told that this is a common occurrence. Could you also discuss salt-spray testing. I would appreciate any help with this. B.C., Grants Pass, Ore.
Most often, this condition is caused by surface tension because of incompatibility between the clear and the basecoat. The two must get along with one another, and your powder supplier should be able to correct this for you. If your supplier didn’t mention it, maybe you’re using different suppliers for the two coatings. What is it you want to know about salt-spray testing? The longer the hours in the test without failure, the longer the service life of the coating as far as adhesion is concerned. You can test panels with a scribe or without a scribe. The most severe test is an X scribe across the panel. You then check for creep into the coating from the scribe mark. The creep allowance may be no creep, 1/8-inch creep, or ¼-inch creep. The more liberal the specification, the shorter the adhesion time of the coating. This isn’t a test for abrasion, dents, gloss resistance, or some other physical characteristics of powder coatings. —G.T.
Q: Q1: I’d like to powder coat the frame of an experimental aircraft, but I’ve heard that the powder coating process can weaken the metal. The metal involved is 6061 T-6 aluminum. I’ve also read that the temperature and cure times can be set to avoid any change in the alloy. What are the correct parameters for maintaining the structural integrity of this aluminum alloy? R.M., Bradenton, Fla. Q2: Do you have any information, recommendation, or advice regarding the concerns that powder coating and the temperatures used will weaken or affect the strength of forged rims. T.T., Kapolei, Hawaii
I’ll answer both R.M. and T. here because their questions are related. Organic thermoset powder coatings (what most people know as standard decorative powder coatings) have cure temperatures between 250°F and 450°F. The cure times at this temperature vary but can be as much as 30 minutes for the lower temperatures and as fast as 10 minutes for the higher temperatures. Pretty much all ferrous materials (steel and iron–tempered or not) have no difficulty with these temperatures and times. However, tempered aluminum (6061 T-6 is tempered aluminum) and softer metals (copper, lead, tin, etc.) can have problems with temperatures above 350°F. The metal temper can be annealed (softened), or the metal may begin melting if it’s subjected to temperatures higher than 350°F. Therefore, any products that have these materials must be cured at temperatures below 350°F, even if it takes longer to complete the cure of the particular powder coating.
@b1:T., you have no worries with your forged steel. However, R.M., you shouldn’t have your parts cured with powder coating above 325°F just to be sure you don’t soften your aircraft structure. You should also be aware that powder coatings are heavier than liquid coatings because they’re applied much thicker. This fact may also cause some issues with adding unnecessary weight to your aircraft as well. —N.L.
Q: When I apply a second coat of powder onto a part, the powder doesn’t cover the side of it. I have an inexpensive hobby-type gun, and I think the voltage isn’t enough for make a good job on the second coat. Is this possible or not? C.T., Victoriaville, Que.
The equipment you’re using isn’t intended for anything more than small hobbyist applications. If you need to get a bit more sophisticated in your coating results, then you should look into an industrial application unit that’s capable of doing everything you want. You can find this equipment used sometimes, but it will take you some searching to find one. They are available. —G.T.
Q: We’ve been custom coaters in Phoenix since the 1980s. We’ve shot powders from the RAL palette since the beginning. We’ve seen improvements in powder quality across the board from all major powder manufacturers, in all formulations. But what has not improved is the uniformity in matching RAL colors from supplier to supplier. They’re all kind of close, but all do not match. Is there any effort by powder manufacturers who sell the RAL palette to come up with standardized RAL colors (similar to Federal Standard) so they all match from supplier to supplier? R.Q., Phoenix, Ariz.
RAL color standards can be very useful in obtaining the same color from different suppliers. However, you must also specify the tolerance you allow the supplier to drift from these standards. For this, we normally use a Cie-LAB standard of 1 ΔE, which is undetectable to the naked eye under most lighting conditions. Some colors may also require a maximum value for each of the L, A, & B values in addition to the ΔE value to ensure color accuracy.
Work with your suppliers to establish your own color standards and tolerances to ensure you obtain consistent results. —N.L.
Q: I’m using sandblasting media, air blowing with compressed air to clean sand out, then cleaning with a solvent, like a paint thinner or alcohol. I then heat the part dry for 15-30 minutes at 370°F (to outgas and dry the part), and then I remove the part from the oven and let it cool to around 150°F or sometimes cooler (tried different temps). The aluminum is usually cast, mostly motorcycle parts. I’ve been told that the pinholes were caused from out-gassing so that’s why I started doing the heating before powder application. It seemed to help, but it hasn’t eliminated the problem. C.S., Windsor, Ont.
Castings, be they ferrous or non-ferrous, will usually cause out-gassing because the metal is porous, as you know. And if the metal has been subjected to a chemical pretreatment, it’s entirely possible that some of the liquid has entered and become trapped in the pores. When heat gets to the part, as in a cure oven, the air will expand and seek a way out, and the liquid trappings can approach boiling and erupt through the coating. Pre-heating may or may not solve this problem. It will certainly reduce the amount of bubbles in the coating. Some years back, I worked with a research type engineer, and his company had a lot of problems with out-gassing. He determined that time was as important as temperature in the preheat stage. Given enough time, you can virtually eliminate the problem. However, in a production mode, you don’t have the time to remove all of the gasses/liquids. So, a compromise is necessary. Sometimes, coating thickness will inhibit the out-gassing, but that adds to cost and can affect appearance. A primer will serve the same purpose and could be the best means of solving the problem. —G.T.
Q: I have a customer who wants us to put THREE coats of our TGIC powder paint onto his sheet metal parts. That seems like a disaster waiting to happen. We cure the paint at around 350°F (the max our oven will go to). Do three coats sound reasonable? What is the maximum paint thickness recommended with these powder paints? J.B., Tulsa, Okla.
Q: Just wondering if you can help with a problem we’re having with our powder not attracting to our parts. As far as we can tell, we’re getting a good ground on our parts that are hanging in our booth, but when we spray the powder on the parts, you can see powder just kind of falling off. And if we try to spray in corners or anywhere there is a bend, the powder won’t stick. This is causing us to overspray the parts to get full coverage, and the powder is very thick after the parts are baked. Our operator for our powder coating said it looks like the powder wants to attract directly to the booth instead of the parts. We’ve tried adjusting our settings on the powder coating machine, but nothing seems to help. Your help would be appreciated. C.M., Lewiston, N.Y.
From here, this is a classic case of little or no ground. It bothers me that you say “as far as you can tell, we have good ground.” You should know precisely whether you have good ground or not. You need a megger meter, or megohm meter, to easily take a reading at the various points along the part stack. If you have 1.0 megohm or less, you have a good ground. Anything over that will gradually be less attractive to the powder. Another way to check ground is to make up a ground wire with a set of alligator clips on each end, and connect to the part and a KNOWN ground. You should see a marked difference. If that isn’t the answer, then the problem immediately gets a bit weird. It could be a powder problem. If the powder is old, improperly stored, or damp (you should see other problems if this is the case), or had a problem right from the start, then there are other ways to test for the cause. However, it sure sounds like a ground problem to me. —G.T.
Q: Are there cool powders? We powder coat aluminum extrusions for making doors and windows, and we want a powder that will reflect the infrared radiation, and the window will remain cool. Let me know how they work and where I can buy them. L.K., Piraeus, Attica, Greece
All of us in the finishing industry think powder coatings are way cool! The physics behind your question are pretty simple: Dark colors absorb light; light colors reflect light. Light absorption will result in heat energy; therefore, architects for years have selected lighter colors for their buildings in climates where light reflection aids in reducing building energy requirements. Selecting metallic colors can further improve light reflectance, which is why most energy-efficient buildings have highly reflective colors on their exterior surface.
In your application, the best solution is not to apply any color at all but use a clear powder to allow the underlying aluminum color to reflect the sunlight. —N.L.
Q: We’re coating automotive components and are in the process of trying to complete a new order for coating shock absorber springs for motorcycles. The powder is repelling from the inner side of the spring in some areas and pin-holing. Because we try to reach the inner side to coat it, we get excessive coating on the outer portion, which isn’t acceptable to our client. What should I do to resolve the coating problem for the inner side of the spring? S.D., Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India
The pinholes could be caused by improper cleaning of the inner portion of the spring. Some oils may still be present. Or, if the space is really tight, you may be getting kilovolt rejection because the gun/electrode is too close to the metal. Springs should be easy to spray. I haven’t tried bike springs, but I have sprayed auto coil springs. You can use one gun to spray the entire spring without moving the spring or the gun. Anyway, spray the interior first, then lightly spray the outside. You can take a good look at the springs when you coat only the interior to get a good idea how much powder will be needed to finish the exterior. I would think that it would take only a light pass to finish coating. If I’m not getting the picture, then take a few photos and e-mail them to me so that I can take another stab at it. —G.T.
Q: I was wondering if you can paint over a powder-coated surface. If so, which type of paint is better–enamel or acrylic? Thanks in advance. S.J., North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
It’s an industry-accepted standard to touch up powder coating with a good quality touch-up paint. It’s been that way for years. Try very hard not to sand defects to bare metal. Just scuff it. If you sand to bare metal, you should apply a pretreatment chemical to the bare metal before painting. These treatment chemicals may be purchased at most automotive refinishing stores. Enamel will work just fine; however, if your product is used in a corrosive atmosphere, the touch-up should be a two-component material. This of course makes the touch-up a bit more complicated and cumbersome, but it’s the best practice. —G.T.
Q: What percentage (maximum) of recovery powder can be mixed to virgin powder with the same characteristics or same appearance after baking? What are the advantages and disadvantages of recoating parts such as rejects and how many coatings could be applied? V.M., Quezon City, Rizal, Philippines
The industry standard for application efficiency is 60 percent. This means that about 40 percent of the powder will go to reclaim. Part configuration and hanger design will impact this efficiency either up or down. Anyway, 40 percent reclaim will normally not cause a problem. If you get more than 50 percent reclaim, you’ll have fluidization problems and impact problems in the hoses and guns, and you’ll have a modified appearance on the parts. Powder chemistry and age can also have affect the reclaim, which will in-turn affect the appearance of the powder on the parts. The number of recoats allowed will depend to a certain degree on the use of the parts. If there are any machined areas, or fit areas with other parts, you shouldn’t apply more than a second coat, depending on the film thickness of the first coat. Orange peel will become more prominent with additional film; therefore, if appearance standards are strict, you may not wish to do a recoat. If the reject is small, you can do a liquid touch-up with a color-matched material, but you’ll have to be the judge of that. —G.T.
Q: We are a small effect powder coater and thermal barrier (ceramics, etc.) applier in Germany. We also sell powder coating machines as a niche product solution for small shops. We are always trying to get a perfect solution for sealing our coatings. We are now at a pretty good stage where we use an industrial one-component nano clear seal (wet paint) that is also cured at 180°C (356°F) for half an hour. Do USA coaters have experience with coatings like that? Can you tell me which powder producers supply powder coatings that produce a real chrome look that can be sealed without fading into yellow or gray? M.W., Luebeck, Germany
First, I’m not sure what you mean by nano. If you mean an organic clear coat, then, yes, we have that here in both powder and liquid form. Powder clear is used on automobile wheels, plumbing fixtures, and many other items. Liquid clear is used on automobiles, bikes, and many other items as well. I’m reasonably certain that nano isn’t a ceramic material because the temperatures aren’t high enough. To find a powder supplier for chrome lookalike powders, you should try the list of powder coatings manufacturers in the magazine’s online Buyer’s Resource. —G.T.
Q: We currently run three lines with automatic spray guns and a reclaim system. My question concerns particle size. When does the particle size become a safety concern? What’s the best method of rotating recycled powder so that it doesn’t become a safety hazard or affect the chargeability/transfer efficiency? I thank you for your assistance. J.A., Kowloon, Hong Kong
This is a bit like powder coating 101. The overspray is made up of mostly smaller particles because they don’t get a charge like the larger particles do. So that’s the dominant particle size of the reclaim. I hope your powder system efficiency is at least 60 percent. Much less than that and you’ll have material handling problems. You shouldn’t have any issues with smaller particles if you’re using a 60 percent virgin to 40 percent reclaim ratio. Too many small particles will affect the cured powder appearance some, not a lot, but some. More important, too much reclaim, that is, small particles, will cause fluidization and application problems. It can get so bad that you won’t be able to fluidize the hopper or move the powder to the guns. The small particles in themselves won’t be a safety problem. Although I’m not sure what your idea of a safety problem is, they will have some small affect on dust-to-air ratios. When this happens, you can risk an explosion or fire, but this will occur when a spark is present. So, if you have a dirty hanger, and the ground is poor, there will be an arc between the gun electrode and the hanger/part. This can cause a fire. An explosion is extremely rare, and a fire is unlikely if you have the proper spark detection systems installed. Now hear this: The particles don’t have to be small for this to occur. It can and usually is regular powder particles that are involved. And if the hangers and conveyor are grounded properly, you won’t have a problem. —G.T.
Q: I have just had my engine and exhaust powder coated. The engine is okay so far, but the down pipes have bubbled up. Why is this? Many thanks. D.D., Cirencester, England
Because the powder coater did not use a heat-resistant powder coating on the exhaust. Eventually, all the powder coating on your exhaust will flake off the parts. Next time, request a dual resin with silicone heat-resistant powder coating formulated for exhaust systems (and gas grilles for that matter). Color choice will be limited, but at least it won’t flake off when the coating is used on parts where the heat is above 275°F. —N.L.
Q: I’m interested in getting feedback on coating plastic. A lot of people are looking at coating plastic based on heating the plastic first. I think there can be irregularities not only in the film build, but also in the gloss and surface of the powder, smooth or textured. Just wanted to let you know, you give great information. C.J., Markle, Ind.
Coating of plastics is a challenge, and I find it interesting that some people seem to think they have an answer and others don’t. Sometimes, just a minuscule thing makes the difference. When I was working on an experiment for a plastic car body, we tried a liquid spray-on material that was purported to enhance electrostatics. If it did, we didn’t notice it, and preheating of the parts became a necessity. We worked many long hours trying to arrive at a proper preheat temperature. Part of the problem was, immediately after preheat, we had to get the body into the powder booth. Well, the powder booth needed to have the reclaim blower on, so it was introducing ambient air under force, which began to cool the part. Allowing for this made for a lot of trial and error on the correct preheat temperature. We sprayed powder with the electrostatics on because the fan pattern was enhanced by the electrostatic field. This effort helped in uniform distribution of the powder. The powder film was within 0.03 mil from side to side on the car body. There are companies that are applying powder coating to plastic bottles. The bottles are on a spindle and rotate, so application is relatively simple. The bottles are preheated in some cases. In other cases, they’re sprayed with the aforementioned electrostatic enhancer. Each of the companies thinks its way is best. Well, who knows. Gloss and powder surface will be affected by the thickness of the plastic because of reinforcing or just plain variances in the plastic. This will show up directly in the powder, usually where preheating is the attraction for the powder. —G.T.
Q: I have some automotive headers and would like them to be powder-coated in flat white that will sustain header heat. I know of ceramic coatings, but that is another process. Any suggestions? B.P., St. Paul, Minn.
High-temperature organic materials are available. Even though these materials are designed for high temps, they’re good for only so long before they will begin to burn. That’s one of the reasons the serious show car exhibitors trailer their vehicles. The pipes never get to sustained high temps. —G.T.
Q: We cut, drill, and buff extruded aluminum parts in a variety of shapes in-house and then powder coat them. We’ve had a higher number of rejects than usual lately because of aluminum chips on the parts. We paint a lot of metallic and mica powder. We installed bag filters and 250-micron filters in screens, but we still see aluminum chips on the parts (under and over the paint). We noticed aluminum flakes and other airborne dirt floating in the cure oven. The aluminum chips show up only on aluminum parts and not on steel parts. What do you recommend we do to determine the cause? Is it coming from the wash, the spray-gun tip, or oven airflow or vibration? K.M., Holland Landing, Ont.
Contaminants in powder-coated products can come from numerous sources. Looking at your coated and cured products will help identify what the sources of these contaminants are. For instance, contaminants on the surface of the coating (not in or under the coating) come from sources after the coating operation (applying the powder). Conversely, contaminants in or under the coating can come from sources either before powder application or during powder application.
Contaminants on top of the coating are typically deposited in the cure oven and are airborne in nature. Contaminants in or under the coating can be mixed in with the reclaimed powder and applied before or during powder application. Visual inspection of parts before they enter the powder coating booth will tell you if there are contaminants on the parts before spray. Finally, spraying clean test panels with reclaimed powder will tell you if your reclaim is contaminated.
Once you’ve identified where the contaminants are in your coating process, you can begin to eliminate them as coating defects. The best way to eliminate these contaminants is to trap and collect them at their source, which in your case in at the fabrication stage. Air hoods and dust containment systems will contain and collect contaminants as they are made by machining operations.
If you can’t eliminate the contaminants at their source, then isolate your powder coating process from your manufacturing process. This is done by installing an environmentally controlled room around the powder coating process. This room should be made of easy-to-clean materials and have positive air pressure to the surrounding plant airspace to keep airborne contaminants from entering the room.
Finally, it’s unlikely that these contaminants are being deposited by your wash system. However, your wash system may not be removing them entirely from the part surface. Increasing dwell time and impingement pressure should fix this issue. —N.L.
Q: Where can I get a powder production process manual? What is the most recommended warehouse storage temperature? J.E., Apodaca, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
Several universities offer symposiums on the formulation of powder coatings and the operation of powder processing equipment. However, I don’t know of any handbooks on the subject. There is a white paper available from Bruno Fawer, associate consultant at Powder Coating Consultants, that may shed some light on your questions. You can reach him by emailing email@example.com.
As for the best storage temperature for a warehouse containing powder coatings, I recommend 70°F to 80°F for most normal formulations. Higher reactive systems (low-temperature-cure powders) should be stored at 60°F to 70°F. —N.L.
Q: What’s the best way to get rid of used powder when we spray to waste? Is there anyone that uses this powder? Right now we put it in the dry-off oven until it gets hard, then throw it away. J., Peoria Heights, Ill.
That’s the best way unless you can find someone who’ll buy it from you. Finding these people isn’t easy because it usually requires some type of sifting or filtering system to clean up the material. If you have a lot, maybe you should consider a reclaim system for high-use powders. —G.T.
Q: What’s the most effective way to remove old powder coating without having to invest in chemical process equipment? I’ve tried media blasting with coal slag, chemicals called “stripper” in an aerosol can, and aircraft paint remover in a liquid form. Most of the products I powder coat are new steel or aluminum, which I prep by media blasting. This is the first time I’ve had to deal with already powder-coated parts. It’s a pain! Are there different removers for steel and aluminum? D.K., Bagley, Minn.
There aren’t different strippers for aluminum and steel that I know of at least. A myriad of companies claim to have metal strippers. Some work, some don’t. The two most effective ways to clean cured powder from a part is by burn-off (not good for aluminum, depending upon the parts) and chemical. Stripper in a can absolutely won’t work as you have apparently found out. The hot-sand method is a variant on the burn-off method. Parts are placed in a container with sand in it and a burner tube. The sand fluidizes, and the heat aids and abets the sand in removing the coating. You’re finding out why, when properly applied, powder is such a good coating. Depending upon the number of parts you have to strip, search for a stripping company in the area and have the company chemically remove the coating. Once the powder is removed from the aluminum, make sure the parts are cleaned of any residuals. Then, pretreat and paint immediately. Aluminum will begin to create its own patina very quickly, and this will negatively affect the adhesion of the paint you’ll apply. —G.T.
Q: I have a part that has two issues. First, the part is stainless steel. Second, it requires 10 to 15 mils of paint. What issues can I expect when powder coating stainless steel, and how difficult will it be to achieve the thickness spec? B.S., Toronto, Ont.
Stainless steel comes in several finishes. The most common is a high-gloss surface. Less common is a muted finish. I don’t suppose you’re lucky enough to be coating the lower-gloss material, which is friendlier to paint than the high-gloss finish. For a lasting finish, you should scuff-sand the area to be coated; otherwise, the finish will scratch easily, and the paint will begin to peel. Depending on the designed film thickness of the powder you’re using, you’ll probably have to build the film in several passes. Trying to get the coating that thick in one pass will most likely create “starring,” or kilovolt rejection. You can apply about 4 mils, maybe 5, in one pass. Place the part in the oven and set the powder, then coat again. Continue until you get the desired film thickness. It certainly would help if the powder is designed for heavy film build. If that’s the case, then you may be able to achieve the thickness in no more than two passes. If you’re going to use an off-the-shelf material, it may require multiple passes. This won’t be a cheap application. I hope that you’ve made your customer aware of the cost. —G.T.
Q: What temperature should galvanized steel reach when degassing it before powder coating over it? S.M., Louisville, Ky.
Preheating galvanized steel may or may not completely degas the substrate. You should experiment with time and temperature settings to eliminate most of the gas. A good starting point is to select the cure temperature and cure time for the powder coating you’re using first and go from there.
Beyond the gas problem, make sure the surface has been “brush blasted” or chemically etched to remove the zinc oxide on the galvanized surface before applying the powder coating. Otherwise, you’ll have an adhesion problem with the powder coating. —N.L.
Q: We’re looking for a material that could be machined and used as part of our powder racks for masking areas of product where no powder is allowed. Masking a part is too costly. We would like this protection to be part of the racks. We have the ability to machine and build special racks. We have a standard powder process with a five-stage washer. We cure parts up to 475°F in our cure oven. B.J., Jasper, Ind.
I know of no material that will resist powder coating and serve as a mask at the same time. The problem is that some things you could use, such as petroleum jelly (shudder), will cause horrendous problems in a powder coating shop. Will petroleum jelly keep the powder off the area? Sure, but then it has to be cleaned off, to say nothing of the contamination problems it would cause. Plastics, such as nylon and a dozen other synthetics will protect the area and survive the heat, for a while, but they have to be cleaned or tossed out and replaced. Exotic metals? They would still draw the electrostatics, and they’re too expensive. So, here are several suggestions. You probably won’t like some of them. You can powder coat first and then machine. It’s done all the time (on engine blocks for example). You can vacuum away the powder from the critical area. This works nicely when the person doing it cares, or if you’re lucky, you can automate. Maybe the critical area can be shielded by something on the hanger. Bad news here is if it needs to be a tight fit, it probably can’t be done. And the hanger will need frequent cleaning. Don’t even think of making a moving piece as part of the hanger because that will get powder coated and cease to function. I suspect you’ll just have to bite the bullet and try some version of the above mentioned items. —G.T.
Q: After powder coating, especially with black color, the powder coating becomes white after a period of time. The parts are mild steel. M.A., Mafraq, Jordan
The problem you describe is called chalking. Powder coating formulas that aren’t formulated for outdoor exposure (ultraviolet-light [UV] resistance) will readily turn from black to white in a relatively short time (a couple of weeks). Epoxies and epoxy-polyester hybrids aren’t formulated for UV exposure and will readily chalk in sunlight.
Select a coating formula that has the UV resistance you need, that is, a polyester or an acrylic formula. These formulas are manufactured to provide excellent UV resistance, meaning that both the resin and the pigments are UV-stabilized. —N.L.
Q: I was wondering if you have any idea where we could have independent testing done on some aluminum parts. We have reports of the paint peeling off aluminum rails and need to find out why this is occurring. The powder we’re using is a custom color through our regular powder distributor, which is the only color we’re having trouble with. I’m hesitant to have the distributor test the powder because I’m not sure how impartial it would be. I thought of our chemical company, but if it’s a problem on that end, I may not receive accurate information either. Any information you can provide will be appreciated. B.F., Hamilton Township, N.J.
The most common reason for a coating to peel off of a substrate is poor metal pretreatment. Actually, that’s about 95 percent of the reason. If you have failure on aluminum, that percentage rises to about 99.9 percent. You have to clean aluminum before coating it. You don’t say what process you’re using, if any, but a description of your current system would be enlightening. There are several sources for testing parts or panels. One is the paint guy. Another is the pretreatment guy. And another is an independent laboratory. The latter is very expensive, which makes one or both of the previous two attractive. I could find a lab for you, but be prepared to pay in the four-figure range for the lab services. If you’ll send a description of your current metal prep method, maybe I can at least eliminate some things that could be at the root of the problem. —G.T.
Q: We’ve had to put on some 2-inch pieces along the top rail of a trailer. When we powder coat it, we seem to blow the powder off the inside instead of making it stick. We’ve tried to move the gun farther away, and we lowered the airflow. The ground seems to be okay while the rest of the trailer is coated. I’m sort of at a loss here. It’s just a very tight space, and there isn’t a way for us to coat it unless we get the gun down inside of that space. A.B., Hugoton, Kans.
Could it be that the main trailer body has a good ground, but when attaching the rail, you lose or greatly reduce the ground? You might try running a ground strap directly to the railing. Beyond that it just might be that this isn’t a good application for powder given the setup. Can you coat the railing before attaching it to the trailer and then touch up the attachment point? —G.T.
Q: Our company specializes in fabrication of aluminum doors and windows. Seven years ago we opened a powder coating plant. Now our finished product produces a ring, or crater, throughout the surface of the aluminum. My question is how to solve this problem. A.N., Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Craters are typically caused by an organic contaminant on the part surface, in the compressed air, or in the surrounding environment. Eliminate this contaminant, and the craters will disappear. Look at your cleaning system to remove all the contaminants on the part surface and verify that you have a water-break-free surface. Ensure that you have a good oil separator on your compressed-air system. Your compressed air must be oil- and moisture- free (lower than a 32°F dew point). Finally, isolate your powder coating operation from surrounding manufacturing operations that may be contaminating the air in, or around, the powder coating process. —N.L.
Q: Some of our customers ask for a color change over already powder-coated parts. We have noticed that some parts accept the deposit; others don’t. Why? Is there anything you can recommend to activate the powder coating before recoating with another coat of powder? A.M., Caguas, Puerto Rico
There are several things you didn’t tell me about your rework process. Are you scuff-sanding the original powder coating before applying the new color? Are the new colors in a powder formula that is compatible with the original? If there is a surface-tension condition between the two powders, you might never be able to get a good second recoat. Make sure you do a good sanding job. Then, run the parts back through the washer with the phosphate off, if there are no bare metal spots, and then recoat. Be alert for any water spots that will leave “salts” on the surface and cause a reject. If you don’t have a washer, solvent wipe the part with a clean cloth after scuffing, allow it to dry, and then recoat it. If this doesn’t do it, then you likely can’t avoid the problem. All recoat powders should be from the same supplier preferably, and they must be of the same resin family. —G.T.
Q: We’re having some issues with parts that have to be spot-welded. The process creates a mark on the metal. This dragging mark bleeds through the powder coating only on light, smooth colors. We had this issue occur 2 or 3 years ago, and I blamed it on the spot-weld process. Now, I’m not sure. I hope you can give me an idea of what’s causing this. Thank you very much. N.M., Brea, Calif.
Not all powder coatings have the same hiding power characteristics. Generally, smoother, higher gloss coatings will highlight metal surface defects like scratches, spot welds, and so on. Conversely, lower gloss and textured powder coatings are much better at hiding surface defects. You have three choices. One is to improve your manufacturing process to eliminate surface defects on the metal before painting. Another way is to change your coating to better hide the defect. If improving the manufacturing process at the source isn’t practical, then adding another step to sand the surface smooth before powder coating is another choice. Selecting a powder coating with better hiding power can be as simple as changing the gloss or increasing the orange peel (up to and including textures, wrinkles, and so on) to hide the defects. —N.L.
Q: What happens when you spray a powder marked tribo with a corona-charging system? I’ve special-ordered a powder from the US for a very important and rush job. The label says tribo. Just wondering if I can still spray the powder with my corona-charging system. B.D., Calgary, Alta.
You shouldn’t have any unusual problems spraying this material with a corona-charging system. The label is marked that way because there is likely a problem spraying just any old powder in a tribo-charging system. Powders for use in a tribo line are formulated for that purpose. There has to be additives that will enhance the natural static charge of the powder passing through a tribo-charging gun. This isn’t a requirement for corona-charging guns. So, you can use it; you’re just wasting the modified formula normally reserved for tribo. —G.T.
Q: We’re processing cold rolled steel (CRS) panels that have been spot-welded with cosmetic spot welding tips. We prep the panels by grinding away the raised spot welds and then by finishing with 120-grit paper. We’re using a white urethane-based polyester powder coating, and our base metal temperature is 400°F for 10 minutes for full cure. The problem is we’re seeing spot welds after the coating is applied. Is there a filler that works for powders? We’ve tried some in the past with very limited success. D.W., Salt Lake City, Utah
Powder, like any other paint, won’t fill in imperfections in a surface. In fact, it will tend to highlight them. Many times if there is a “crack” around the defect, the powder will flow away from the crack and really accentuate it. There are body fillers of various substances that can be used for filling in voids, but you must make sure the filler can tolerate the bake temperature of the powder. Limited success is what you’re going to find with any of the fillers. I’m assuming that you’ve tried feathering the sanding in a broad area around the spot weld. If you haven’t tried it, give it a shot. —G.T.
Q: I have a problem. Some of the powder overspray has gotten on car upholstery, and I would like to know of a way to remove it. The temperature in the car was high but not enough to set the powder completely. We’ve tried many different things and nothing has worked. We need your help ASAP. R.D., Salt Lake City, Utah
Uncured powder coatings are very susceptible to solvent. Clean your car interior with a solvent that won’t hurt the fabrics or hard surfaces. Test the solvent in an area that isn’t easily seen to ensure that it won’t hurt the surface you want to clean. —N.L.
Q: We currently apply wet coating systems for miscellaneous equipment in industrial markets and have batch oven capabilities for curing phenolics, epoxies, vinyl esters, and fluoropolymer-type coating systems. We’re considering getting into custom (large, heavy, non-line) powder coating systems, such as zincs, epoxies, and TGIC-based polyesters, and would like to know what the downfalls of using some of our existing processes and equipment would be. Currently, we blast-clean items to a minimum of SP10 or NACE 2. We don’t have a pretreatment system other than solvent cleaning and blasting, and our original paint booth wasn’t designed for powder applications. Based on some of the responses I’ve read before in your columns, I can just imagine what’s going through your head. Can this be done, or should we look at having two different setups for applying wet and powder materials? Looking forward to your reply. T.M., Ontario, Canada
You can probably guess what at least some of my response will be. I’ll try to be gentle. Solvent wiping is like doing nothing, or the next thing to it. Blasting really, in theory, is merely cleaning the surface. You are doing no metal prep, and that is where you get rid of deep oils and condition the part surface for much improved adhesion and rust prevention. Blasting will not always remove some mill oils—not well enough for a water-break-free surface. And you won’t know about water-break conditions because you aren’t using a washer. With no washer, there are customers out there who will not or should not use your services. I’m not saying that’s bad. There may be enough business requiring a lower level of performance to keep you busy. That’s a business decision you need to weigh versus the cost of purchasing and operating a chemical pretreatment line. And there are environmental obstructions, too, depending upon the local regulations. This washer line can be used to service both the liquid and the powder business, and it would raise you a level or two for additional work. Okay, so much for pretreatment and other types of metal prep. You absolutely don’t want to mix powder and liquid in the same booth. You’ll be suicidal in a matter of minutes. You can use a similar type booth, one that doesn’t reclaim, but sprays to waste. You would need a dry-filter booth with a very good blower. You must contain the powder. It’s the law, and you don’t want to pay for repainting a lot of cars out in the parking lot. You consider how much spraying you’re going to do, and if it’s cost-effective to have or not to have a reclaim system. Since you plan to spray so many different resin base materials, it would be intelligent not to reclaim. Then, you just have to price your work to allow for spray-to-waste. You wouldn’t be the first person to do what you’re proposing. If you have good planning and keep your head clear and your pencil sharp, you can make it work. It’s not what I like, but hey, it’s not my money or my facility. —G.T.
Q: I’ve heard that powder booth cartridge filters can be cleaned and reconditioned. Is this true? If so, how good a job will they do after cleaning? Do you know of anyone who does this? N.N., Statesville, N.C.
You can remove the filter from the collector and place it on its side on a piece of throwaway material, such as paper or vinyl or whatever. Grab each end of the filter with a hand, lift the filter about 15 inches above the floor, and drop it. Rotate the filter about 6 inches and repeat this process. This will buy you some time, but the filter won’t be “like new.” This method doesn’t usually eliminate the powder that is deep in the recesses of the filter. You could place the filter in the booth and use compressed air to complete the job; however, the time spent doing all of this would probably buy you a new filter, depending on your hourly rate. Several companies in the US and Canada reclaim filters. I’ve seen them, and the filters look good. How well they hold up, I have no idea. Check the magazine’s Online Buyers Guide. —G.T.
Q: I’m having a problem with the powder coating looking like it has dirt in it. You can rub your hands across the surface and feel the imperfections. I’m preheating all my items before applying the powder. Any help would be great. R.G., Mooresville, N.C.
If it feels like dirt and looks like dirt, it probably is dirt. If the part is a casting, it could be outgassing bubbles, but with a hawk’s eye, you should be able to see the difference between dirt and outgassing. Pull a sample of powder from a sealed box of powder and spray it onto a cleaned piece of sheet metal to see if you get dirt. This exercise is to eliminate the possibility of a problem in the powder.
Can you see anything in the powder-coated part before curing? If you can, spray a clean, uncured part in the paint booth, or in a clean room, then send the part through the cure oven. You may also have air currents that are bringing in dirt that you don’t notice but is being attracted to the electrostatically charged part.
Now, if it’s outgassing, preheating is one way to reduce the amount of bubbles. You can also put on a heavy single coat. And you can spray a light coat, partially cure, and then finish spraying and completely cure the part to see if that doesn’t eliminate, or at least make tolerable, the amount of bubbles…if that’s what it really is! —G.T.
Q: I just had a custom lumber rack built for my truck, and the builder left out two small angle braces. Is there any way these pieces can be added, and the powder coating touched up without sandblasting the entire rack? T.S., Sebastopol, Calif.
You cannot field-repair your rack (after welding) with powder coating. However, you can use liquid coatings (spray paint) touch-up and end up with something that still looks good. However, this area will not perform to the same high quality as the surrounding powder-coated areas. This may not be a problem if the angle-brace fix occurs in an area of the rack that does not see severe abuse. If you want the entire rack to look and perform the same, then you will have to strip the rack, weld on the brackets, clean, and recoat it again. Sorry for the bad news. —N.L.
Q: I had a lower unit for an outboard motor powder coated recently. When I picked it up, it had what looked like small busted bubbles (pores) in the coating. The guy who did it said it was from the metal (aluminum) having pores in it. Is this guy BSing me because he did a poor job, or is it true? I wasn’t satisfied with his work, but he said it was unavoidable due to the metal condition. This condition isn’t over the whole piece but just in various places (some of them in places where I know the metal was smooth). E.W., Anacoco, La.
He wasn’t feeding you a line, at least not from where I sit. Aluminum will outgas because of the porosity of the metal. However, another chemical action is at work as well. Aluminum forms a self-protective skin much the same as a galvanized part will. For good powder adhesion and surface appearance, this skin must be removed before powder coating. If the aluminum is cleaned and then is allowed to set for much more than 4-6 hours, this skin will begin to reform, and it will interfere with a good finish. The way to finish any boat aluminum would be to chemically clean and chromate, apply a primer, and then apply a topcoat. The part should be allowed to dehydrate after the chromate application. Some heat may be used to accelerate the drying, but this heat must be limited to no more than 180°F. You probably won’t get all this refinishing work at a “local” shop, so your best bet is to sand (if required), apply a primer, and then apply a topcoat. The thickness of the powder will inhibit the bubbles from reaching the surface, and the finish will last much longer. —G.T.
Q: Has anyone power coated stainless steel air conditioning and power steering lines for automobiles? I want to have the stainless powder coated in a flat black finish. Any help will be appreciated. J.M., Poland, Ohio
If these are braided stainless steel lines, then forget about powder coating them because they will no longer be flexible after coating. Moreover, most small powder coating shops will have difficulty powder coating stainless steel because the powder does not easily bond to this surface. For these reasons, I would not recommend this idea. —N.L.
Q: We manufacture and powder coat threaded assemblies for our finished product. We’re having trouble controlling the powder thickness on these parts. We have explored caps and tape, and would prefer a different method. Is there a liquid or paste inhibitor we can apply to the threads to keep powder from sticking to them? J.B., Cerritos, Calif.
Your problems will only get worse if you use the materials you’re mentioning. Trust me. I’ve seen great success with the use of a vacuum to remove unwanted paint from threads and other machined areas. There are a variety of methods. Most often, you can affix a ¼-inch vinyl tube to a vacuum source and then, either by hand or by fixture, remove the powder from the critical areas. The vacuum source is a commercial type suction unit. Don’t use a Shop-Vac. The filter isn’t intended for particulate as fine as powder. Always, the end pickup unit is fabricated in your own shop. —G.T.
Q: I actually have a couple of questions. First, I recently had an issue with various parts all having paint flake off. I could take a razor blade and cut and actually pull flakes up. I’ve been unable to recreate this situation. Has anyone had this happen? I’ve had the powder, chemicals, and steel all tested. Nothing is standing out. Second, in an effort to cut costs and maximize throughput, we’ve been shutting our ovens down with parts in the line. Even though nothing is currently happening, are there any unforeseen issues by doing this? J.H., Pompano Beach, Fla.
The answer to your first question is “see question #2.” The answer to your second question is “see question #1.” Joking aside, if you have already verified that your pretreatment is good and your lack of adhesion comes and goes, then these situations can be linked. Powder coatings must wet-out on the metal substrate to provide good adhesion. This wet-out occurs early in the heat cycle in the cure oven when heat rapidly melts and flows the powder to wet-out on the substrate. If you stop parts in an oven that is shutdown, the heat energy dissipates quickly and the melting/flowing stops before proper wet-out occurs. Even if you start up your oven and preheat it to operating temperature before you start the conveyor, you may never attain proper wet-out of the powder on the surface.
In addition, interrupting the cure cycle by stopping parts in the oven during shutdown and start-up can lead to over- or under-curing your parts. Both over- and under-curing your parts will affect adhesion and can make the coating very brittle. Since these conditions do not occur when you run your process normally, this problem will appear to go away. Therefore, my first inclination and joke can be the root cause of your problems. —N.L.
Q: Can Class A terminology be used for a part that is to be powder-coated? I know that parts can be prepped and cleaned to be Class A, but can they expect the actual paint to have any imperfections at all? As far as I know, this terminology can’t be used for powder because it can’t be controlled as easily as liquid paint can. L.E., San Jose, Calif.
It depends. The only two things that affect powder coatings more than liquid coatings are orange peel and film thickness. Anyway, what’s a Class A finish? Automobiles demand a Class A finish. Well, powder is used on most automobiles, and some very expensive ones at that, so where’s the issue? Film build isn’t as tightly controlled in powder coating as it is in electrocoating, but it can be as tight as a tenth of a mil. Dirt is dirt, and defects are defects, no matter what the coating. Dust can be a slightly greater problem for powder, but you can control that, too, unless you are trying to operate on the cheap. So, what’s the problem? —G.T.
Q: I’ve been coating automotive wheels for years, mostly older steel wheels from classic car restorations but also newer wheels. I’ve been hearing lately that aluminum alloy wheels shouldn’t be powder-coated because the curing temperature and dwell time make the aluminum wheels brittle. I have also seen feature articles in the magazine about companies coating wheels but no mention of this problem. Is this true and are there other coating methods that can be used to overcome this problem? K.W., Westminster, Md.
Some aluminum wheels are made from tempered aluminum alloys. The most common type is 6061 T6 aluminum. The T6 represents the temper and is used to increase the hardness and strength of the aluminum alloy. Temper can be annealed (softened) under heat above 300°F. Therefore, great care must be exercised when powder coating aluminum wheels with tempered alloys. Always use powder coatings that have good cure characteristics at 300°F and don’t cure them above this temperature. —N.L.
Q: We’re powder coating 18-gauge Galvannealed material. We’re cleaning with a five-stage washer and powder coating with a black wrinkle epoxy. We’re seeing bubbling and fingerprints coming back through the powder. We use infrared heat and are manually spraying the powder. Is there something we can do to prevent this? This material has given us trouble in the past. K.M., Cedar Rapids, Iowa
The bubbling is a problem with galvanizing of any type. Often, a little preheat will drive out the gases, and then you can powder coat after cooling the part to ambient. The fingerprints? Well, check closely before washing to see if someone is handling the parts with heavy grease or oils on their hands or gloves to determine if the washer is having a problem removing the residual. Maybe the sprayer is turning the parts with his hand and leaving a print. If he has to do this, give him a wire hook to touch the parts so that he doesn’t have to use his hand. —G.T.
Q: Is it possible to apply a powder coating over satin chrome or high-polished chrome-plated parts? If we could, it would save us a lot of money in rework and scrap costs. However, some of our parts are hand-operated, and we don’t want our decorative finishes to start peeling after several years. R.C., Steeleville, Ill.
I don’t know of any way you can powder coat over chrome without a high risk of peeling in the immediate or near future unless you abrade the surface with steel wool, 3M-type pads, or similar materials. The hard chrome surface won’t allow the coating to get a grip. Satin chrome might extend the time before peeling commences. I’ve never tested adhesion to satin chrome, so I suggest you try some samples before you go to production pieces. Acid etching the chrome is ineffective unless the acid is very strong, and then you have a great risk of damaging the chrome. It’s very risky to expect the powder coating not to peel. You have no control over how the part may be used by the customer. —G.T.
Q: We powder coat in two facilities, and our safety director is directing us not to use compressed air to clean off ourselves after applying powder. I guess OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) will site us for this practice. I’m curious how others in our industry are cleaning off afterward. I have an air-operated vacuum, but it’s so powerful, I’m afraid it would be more dangerous than compressed air. M.G., Iron Mountain, Mich.
There is an OSHA-approved tip for an air hose that restricts output pressure and has relief holes that will divert the air in case the user gets the tip too close to something, namely the body. These are used just about everywhere and have been around for years. The automobile companies have been using these tips for many years, and they are extremely safety conscience. Your safety director should be made aware of these devices so that you can go about your business. Using a vacuum with the suction restricted is a possibility, but vacuuming clothes is awkward and time-consuming. I hope the safety person listens to you when you tell him about this. —G.T.
Q: We have an aluminum frame that has gold chromate conversion coating under the powder and masking lines. We have to re-powder coat the part. The part was powder-coated twice, and the customer doesn’t like the finish. The part came out with heavy texture and a rough finish. We had to sand and re-powder coat, and the gloss ended up being dull and sandy feeling. L.B., Springfield, Mass.
As you probably know, at least by now, heavy powder coating will result in pronounced orange peel, which some people don’t like. Determine the extent of the orange peel the customer will find satisfactory. That will become your standard. Then, you should show your customer what a second coat looks like to see if he objects. Your customer must be aware that if the second coat isn’t to his liking, the part will probably be scrapped. I hasten to add, however, that if you have or have access to chemical stripping, you might be able to strip off the old powder and then reprocess the parts. Most likely, the chemical stripping will affect the conversion coating, and it will need to be reprocessed through the bath. You should discuss this with the conversion coating supplier. I’m not sure why the reworked part was dull and rough. That would depend on how you sanded it and how you cleaned it after sanding. If you sanded through the chromate treatment, then you set up the aluminum to begin its self-protecting patina, which could cause the rough finish–and will cause a loss of adhesion at some point. —G.T.
Q: We recently coated machined aluminum parts with many holes of different sizes with a flat, beige polyester powder. The surface immediately surrounding the plugs was bumpy. The second time we coated this same part the customer purchased the plugs from a different vendor and cut the plugs flush with the surface, but the results were the same. We cure at 400°F for 15 minutes; we’ve had the problem with other parts and think the plugs are made from silicone. Is there a reaction between the plugs and the powder? How can we correct the problem? Thank you in advance. P.L., Cleveland, Ohio
All masking devices (plugs, caps, tape) must withstand the cure temperatures for powder coatings. In most cases, the plugs are made from silicone materials for this purpose. Silicone in solid form isn’t a problem with any coating system. Airborne silicones are what caused fisheyes and other finishing problems.
The bumpy and rough surface around the plugged holes is due to low film build (coating thickness). The space between the end of the plug and the part is very narrow, making coating this area difficult. Trimming the plug to reduce the shielding from the masking device can help with this issue. Ensuring proper coverage in this area will also eliminate this problem.
Finally, the machined part may have some machining fluids/coolants inside the hole. If you mask the part before pretreatment/cleaning activities, this fluid/coolant will stay in the hole. When you cure the powder coating this liquid will vaporize and push this gas past the plug mask and blow off some of the powder coating in the area. You can try fixing this by cleaning and drying the part first, then inserting the plug for masking. —N.L.